DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25005.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Simon Pepping wrote:
I have taken a look at the way this question is dealt with in LaTeX
(TeX does not have the notion of font families, LaTeX does). Here the
question what to use for small caps font is deferred to the font
setup. The font definition tables must define a small caps font. If
they
Victor Mote wrote:
FOP Developers:
This has been kicked around recently, but I realized that it may be
beneficial to go ahead and propose a change to get things going. The issue
of how Properties are stored in the FO Tree is in play. Since we now have FO
Tree pretty well isolated, I see some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25022.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The set of property values relevant to a
particular FO are
available in a sparse array, accessible by the int
index corresponding
to the Property.
Which source file has the enumerations of the
properties--I'd like to see how you listed them.
Glen Mazza wrote:
A few more ideas:
(1.) You may find that most of the properties that
need to be pulled out of the renderers and layout are
actually Area Tree object traits, so renderers
layout will probably also benefit from having the Area
Tree having these types of accessor functions.
Peter B. West wrote:
I'm fuzzy with this stuff, but isn't renderer-context a new notion?
What you are calling renderer-context was previously only associated
with the renderer as such, wasn't it? I'm assuming that the
renderer-context is something that amalgamates font metrics. Renderers
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes sense. I always like to let the compiler do
the work for me, so I
would probably first make all of the Property stuff
private, recompile, and
start fixing compile errors.
Oh...the smoke 'em out! style of programming! I
enjoy that too...
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 14:45, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The set of property values relevant to a
particular FO are
available in a sparse array, accessible by the int
index corresponding
to the Property.
Which source file has the enumerations of
Peter B. West wrote:
What's the intention for the FOP font system? Is FOP going to define a
set of fonts and font metrics in its User Agent font database (as per
CSS2)? Will this be defined with reference to the supported renderers
(statically), the supported renderers and the fonts
Peter B. West wrote:
depend on the type supported by the Property. Take MaxWidth. What
value will be returned? An int, representing the number of millipoints?
An Integer? A Length object? What happens when the width is, as
yet, unresolved, because it depends upon the resolution of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs book.xml
chrisg 2003/11/25 17:12:46
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs book.xml
Log:
Added link to the Wiki
Chris:
Victor Mote wrote:
Yes, this can get ugly. If anybody knows of a way to find the physical font
file from an awt Font object, please speak up.
Currently (as of 1.4.1 you can create a awt.Font from an InputStream, but
you cant get back whatever physical representation the font has from
the awt.Font
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Peter B. West wrote:
If a user renders a given .fo file on two different systems, using the
same renderer (say, PDF), and specifies a font family (say, Baskerville)
that does not exist on the first system, but does on the second, what
result should be expected?
If the user specified a fallback,
Victor Mote wrote:
This is a good question. The answer to the first part is that it should
return an int, representing the number of millipoints. When it cannot be
resolved, it should return an int constant TBD_LAYOUT (or whatever), which
is equal to -32,987 (or whatever). So, the Area Tree or
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:21:33PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
Simon Pepping wrote:
I have taken a look at the way this question is dealt with in LaTeX
(TeX does not have the notion of font families, LaTeX does). Here the
question what to use for small caps font is deferred to the font
setup.
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current implementation might look like this:
public class FObj {
public int getMaxWidth() { //WARNING
-- unchecked or tested!!
return
properties.get(max-width).getLength().getValue();
}
A subclass that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
there's a page about obfuscating code:
http://mindprod.com/unmainnaming.html
however, I especially liked some sidetracks like
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/gotchas.html#INCONSISTENCIES
for a good laugh.
Just in case...
J.Pietschmann
Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The set of property values relevant to a
particular FO are
available in a sparse array, accessible by the int
index corresponding
to the Property.
Which source file has the enumerations of the
properties--I'd like to see how you
Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current implementation might look like this:
public class FObj {
public int getMaxWidth() { //WARNING
-- unchecked or tested!!
return
properties.get(max-width).getLength().getValue();
}
A subclass
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
If a user renders a given .fo file on two different systems, using the
same renderer (say, PDF), and specifies a font family (say,
Baskerville) that does not exist on the first system, but does on the
second, what result should be expected?
If the
24 matches
Mail list logo
