(Copyright question) Re: Committing documentation

2004-07-26 Thread Glen Mazza
I believe the key word below is transferable, i.e., before checking any work in, it still needs to be copyright The Apache Software Foundation at the time of it being cvs committed. Dirk-Willem, might you know more about this? (Original comments in [1] below.) But I noticed Simon already

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30156] - Image file opened but not closed

2004-07-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30156. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: (Copyright question) Re: Committing documentation

2004-07-26 Thread Simon Pepping
I completely agree with Christian's comment and extract of the CLA. I have signed it and thereby it applies to any work I commit to FOP's repository. That is my intention with the documentation. I wrote 'copyright the Authors', with the idea that every contributor adds his name as an author. But

Re: (Copyright question) Re: Committing documentation

2004-07-26 Thread Glen Mazza
Simon, My past emails on this topic had a rude tone to it that I regret...I apologize for that. I just didn't know how things should be copyrighted once they're in the repository and just wanted to make sure we are doing things properly. Thanks for your work (especially since it's in Docbook ;)

Re: Javasrc, JXR and documentation

2004-07-26 Thread Clay Leeds
Peter, On Jun 29, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Peter B. West wrote: Clay, FYI, Java 1.4 javadoc tool supports a -linksource argument, which generates html of source files. However, the process seems to have pretty much the same restrictions as the Maven JXR - the only references are to line numbers,