Re: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-11 Thread Jean-François Selber
yes there is a problem. I have used fop in a servlet and i should synchronized fop running. jf - Original Message - From: "Chaumette, Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:34 PM Subject: Re: Multithreading FOP ?

Re: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-11 Thread David B. Bitton
, 2002 8:05 AM Subject: Re: Multithreading FOP ? > > could you precise the degree of threadsafeness ? > > I read about the problems with the image package, are there other areas ? > > I think that's the worst bug right now. There is another one, but I > can't find i

Re: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-11 Thread Jeremias Maerki
> could you precise the degree of threadsafeness ? > I read about the problems with the image package, are there other areas ? I think that's the worst bug right now. There is another one, but I can't find it anymore. > The possible use of FOP in WebSphere without any servlet is currently my > i

Re: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-11 Thread Chaumette, Patrick
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Multithreading FOP ? To a certain degree, yes. Not all issues have been dealt with, yet. > I read in an older posting that FOP is not thread safe. > Is this still the case ? Cheers, Jeremias Märki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OUTLINE AG Postfach 3954 - Rhyna

Re: Multithreading FOP ?

2002-04-11 Thread Jeremias Maerki
To a certain degree, yes. Not all issues have been dealt with, yet. > I read in an older posting that FOP is not thread safe. > Is this still the case ? Cheers, Jeremias Märki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OUTLINE AG Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern Tel. +41 41 317 2020 - Fax +41 41

RE: Multithreading

2001-07-17 Thread Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak
- From: Jim Cotugno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multithreading > I don't know if anyone has done any extensive testing of concurrency with > FOP, so please let us know what problems you run into (the IndexOutOfB

RE: Multithreading

2001-07-17 Thread Jim Urban
1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multithreading > I don't know if anyone has done any extensive testing of concurrency with > FOP, so please let us know what problems you run into (the IndexOutOfBounds > for example), either via this list, or better yet, via Bugzilla so

RE: Multithreading

2001-07-17 Thread Jim Cotugno
> I don't know if anyone has done any extensive testing of concurrency with > FOP, so please let us know what problems you run into (the IndexOutOfBounds > for example), either via this list, or better yet, via Bugzilla so we can > track and fix the issues. I've fixed a few places where I found co

RE: Multithreading

2001-06-25 Thread Kelly Campbell
I don't know if anyone has done any extensive testing of concurrency with FOP, so please let us know what problems you run into (the IndexOutOfBounds for example), either via this list, or better yet, via Bugzilla so we can track and fix the issues. I've fixed a few places where I found concurrenc

Re: Multithreading problems

2001-06-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Kelly and Arved, thank you your comments. > At 01:56 PM 6/12/01 -0600, Kelly Campbell wrote: > >I seem to remember fixing some of the possible problems in a more recent > >release. And I know Keiron or Arved also fixed a problem with a static page > >numbering variable that would cause problems

RE: Multithreading problems

2001-06-12 Thread Arved Sandstrom
At 01:56 PM 6/12/01 -0600, Kelly Campbell wrote: >I seem to remember fixing some of the possible problems in a more recent >release. And I know Keiron or Arved also fixed a problem with a static page >numbering variable that would cause problems like that. To be exact, the fact that page-number w

RE: Multithreading problems

2001-06-12 Thread Kelly Campbell
I seem to remember fixing some of the possible problems in a more recent release. And I know Keiron or Arved also fixed a problem with a static page numbering variable that would cause problems like that. Try 0.18.1 and see if it works better for your application. One approach for tracking down