Victor Mote wrote:
> 3. Running "build.sh usage" indicates that "build.sh docs" should build the
> html documentation. There is no target for "docs", but there is one for
> "htmldoc". This appears to be a bug, for which I will submit a patch after I
> am more confident that I understand what shoul
Keiron Liddle wrote:
...
> If you don't know there is an effort going on called Forrest that is an
> overhaul of the website documentation process etc. It will eventually be
> creating pdf files etc.
A draft version has been committed, and can be seen on our automatically
updated hourly test si
> As I am trying to get my arms around FOP, I am finding some things that I
> probably ought to propose as changes to the documentation, but I am confused
> about the mechanism for doing so.
>
> 1. It appears that the main documentation deliverable is the HTML pages that
> are on the web site and
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 22:26, Victor Mote wrote:
> FOP developers:
>
> As I am trying to get my arms around FOP, I am finding some things that I
> probably ought to propose as changes to the documentation, but I am confused
> about the mechanism for doing so.
Hope you have long arms.
> 1. It app
