Re: Properties documentation

2002-01-02 Thread Keiron Liddle
On 2002.01.02 15:10 Peter B. West wrote: > Keiron, > > Thanks for clueing me up on the documentation. I strongly accept you > recommendation, and I will gladly use it in future. Btw, the heading > graphics from the the design documents seem to have been screwed up. > Have you noticed this?

Re: Properties documentation

2002-01-02 Thread Peter B. West
Keiron, Thanks for clueing me up on the documentation. I strongly accept you recommendation, and I will gladly use it in future. Btw, the heading graphics from the the design documents seem to have been screwed up. Have you noticed this? Peter Keiron Liddle wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks

Re: Properties documentation

2002-01-01 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi Peter, Thanks for the work. Maybe this can go with the rest of the design. I would strongly suggest that you do not write the html. The apache web site is done from xml and all the images, layout etc. is done from a stylesheet. These will also be updated by others. If you look at "docs/xml-d

Re: Properties documentation

2001-12-30 Thread Peter B. West
Bernard, Thanks for that. I have just had a long day trying to make the html at least readable under Navigator 4.75. Isn't html wonderful? I have also tried the current Opera 5.0 release on linux, with reasonable results. The problem with using CSS is that the actual font sizes on a partic

Re: Properties documentation

2001-12-29 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Saturday 29 December 2001 02:57, Peter B. West wrote: >. . .let me know if there is some easy way to get full > conformance with the Apache XML norm, or if there are severe problems > viewing these pages with modern browsers. Hi Peter, FYI, with Konqueror (modern yes, 100% finished maybe not),