On 2001.11.27 12:40 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Without knowing too much about FOP internals, I think a processing chain
along these lines might help:
parsing if needed
- SAX events
- FO attributes processing (validation, inheritance)
- StructureRenderer
StructureRenderer is
EITHER
Hi,
as a former (0.19 was running fine) and future user (hope I
get 0.20.2 up again, 0.20.1 was kind of a mess in my environment)
of fop I'd first like to thank for it. Great work!
Second I have a question on the API of the Driver Object, which
is a bit about aesthetic
Deep within a XSLT
Can you send me your JAVA_HOME, build.bat and fo.bat?
another question: has you a class as follow?
org.apache.fop.fo.properties.Precedence
my jdk raise this Class not found, so I don't know where I can retreive
it.
Seems it's missing together with other hundred classes!
Thanks. Antonio.
Hi
I am generating a simple document with fixed font family. If the fo:block
contains the new line( with the space collapsed), then the next line in PDF
is shifted by one character length to the right.
FO:
fo:page-sequence master-name=simplePM
fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body
Hi,
I've added support for the 'letter-spacing' property. A patch to fop
0.20.2, and a test case are added to this mail.
I would really appreciate some feedback on this, especially from one of
the core developers.
Thanks,
--
Raymond Penners
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
fo:root
I did not solve the problem, I was going to add the
line that I said oops on in the original message,
sorry for the confusion. I will try this and see if it
works.
Thanks,
Bryan
--- Beer, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bryan,
did you solve the problem, or what does the oops
mean??
Sorry this is probably not the most appropriate forum, but I have looked
everywhere I can think of. If anyone on this list can point me in the right
direction I would be grateful.
Thanks,
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Brian T. Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: comp.text.xml
Sent:
Silly me, the sample I included in the message is not what I was really
using. Instead of xsl:value-of select=sum(tax_item/amount)/ I was really
using xsl:number value=sum(tax_item/amount)/. The value-of does seem
to work better - thanks!
I still need to include your suggestion for the
This was already a known thing, and Norman Walsh
pointed it out also.
There is simply no point in fixing this until the
FOP rewrite emerges.
Arved Sandstrom
- Original Message -
From:
Carmelo Montanez
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:14
