Kevin O'Neill wrote:
Peter,
I was wondering if you have a two minute overview of the differences
between your design and the main stream one?
Kevin,
My initial response is No, but I will give it a go. I hope you don't
mind my CC'ing the dev list, in case anyone else is curious.
My initial
Re some recent questions on this topic. As I understand it, creating a
branch in the tree off an existing file set simply involves tagging the
set of files with the new branch tag. From that point on, as long as a
particular file remains unchanged, a checkout on either branch will
retrieve a
Peter
This is an idea I was also playing with. Avalon does that, too. But
having multiple subprojects (that's what they are, not modules) brings
it own difficulties. There are several pros and cons to this:
+ Encourages loose coupling and good design
+ Components that could in theory be used
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
But please, let's put our
efforts together to bring FOP to a version 1.0 as soon as possible. A
lot is already there. We can build on that.
That's what I wanted to say all the thread, +1.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
keiron 2002/11/03 08:24:22
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/area AreaTree.java
CachedRenderPagesModel.java PageViewport.java
Trait.java
src/org/apache/fop/datatypes ColorType.java
src/org/apache/fop/fo/flow
keiron 2002/11/03 08:24:45
xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/list - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
keiron 2002/11/03 08:29:58
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/flow ListBlock.java ListItem.java
ListItemLabel.java ListItemBody.java
src/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table Row.java
Added: src/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/list Item.java
Peter B. West wrote:
Re some recent questions on this topic. As I understand it, creating a
branch in the tree off an existing file set simply involves tagging the
set of files with the new branch tag. From that point on, as long as a
particular file remains unchanged, a checkout on either
Keiron,
Re your latest commits, could you comment on what you had to do to make
sure area tree is serializable? I have been curious about aspects of
the serialization of trees for some time now.
Peter
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
Lord, to whom shall
Victor Mote wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
Re some recent questions on this topic. As I understand it, creating a
branch in the tree off an existing file set simply involves tagging the
set of files with the new branch tag. From that point on, as long as a
particular file remains unchanged, a
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Peter
This is an idea I was also playing with. Avalon does that, too. But
having multiple subprojects (that's what they are, not modules) brings
My sloppy use of the term module.
it own difficulties. There are several pros and cons to this:
+ Encourages loose coupling
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 00:36, Peter B. West wrote:
Keiron,
Re your latest commits, could you comment on what you had to do to make
sure area tree is serializable? I have been curious about aspects of
the serialization of trees for some time now.
Peter
Hi Peter,
As you probably know
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 21:31, Rainer Garus wrote:
A link from page A to page B is only rendered in the pdf renderer correctly if page
B is prepared by the renderer before page A is rendered. In the following case page A
is rendered before page B is prepared (PN (X) is the pagenumber of page X):
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:22:14 +1000 Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Peter
This is an idea I was also playing with. Avalon does that, too. But
having multiple subprojects (that's what they are, not modules) brings
My sloppy use of the term module.
it own difficulties.
14 matches
Mail list logo
