Re: Connection between FO object and Area object

Hello Victor, thanks for your answer. This subject is really critical for my application, at the moment. So my only chance is to implement it myself. At least, I'm going to try. In case of succes, I'll post changes in this mailing list... Tibor - Original Message - From: Victor Mote

RE: Connection between FO object and Area object

Tibor Vyletel wrote: thanks for your answer. This subject is really critical for my application, at the moment. So my only chance is to implement it myself. At least, I'm going to try. In case of succes, I'll post changes in this mailing list... It is pretty critical for what I am working

Measure (accurately) before optimizing.

Mea (tool) culpa! I am investigating an inaccuracy in CPU measurements reported by the Java Memory Profiler Tool that led me to the conclusion thet PropertyList.findProperty is the high-runner in FOP 0.20.5. A couple of other profilers report that findProperty() uses more CPU than we would like

Re: String.intern() test and measurement

John Austin wrote: A high runner in FOP 0.20.5 is: PropertyList.findProperty(). It calls other functions in org.apache.fop.fo that consume significant CPU resources. In one example it called itself recursively to a (depth of 10) Without taking a closer look at the code, I suspect it tries to find

RE: String.intern() test and measurement

-Original Message- From: Finn Bock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I can see performance slow down well before 100.000 unique string are interned. snip / I've attached another demo program that shows that intern'ing is slower than doing memory sharing with a Hashtable. This programs

RE: String.intern() test and measurement

-Original Message- From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for(int i= cnt; --i = cnt; ) sorry. meant 0 cheers, andreas