Time is over. Let's see the results (I hope I've got everything right
here):
PART A
--
9 +1s, no -1s
FOP team:
Glen Mazza, Peter B. West, Clay Leeds, Christian Geisert, Jörg
Pietschmann, Chris Bowditch, Simon Pepping, Jeremias Märki
Batik:
Thomas DeWeese
I think we can consider the vote
So let's vote on the PMC chair for the XML Graphics project. We have two
nominated candidates:
[ ] I vote for Peter B. West as PMC chair.
[ ] I vote for Jeremias Maerki as PMC chair.
Simple majority will decide. If we get a draw we'll figure something out.
This vote will close at 23:59
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
So let's vote on the PMC chair for the XML Graphics project. We have two
nominated candidates:
[ ] I vote for Peter B. West as PMC chair.
[ ] I vote for Jeremias Maerki as PMC chair.
Simple majority will decide. If we get a draw we'll figure something out.
I'm abstaining,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Jul 8, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Peter B. West wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
Peter,
Did you get a chance to try the procedure Nicola recommended[1]? I
haven't gotten a successful build yet, but I'm still working at it.
When I do, I'll try to do as he suggested.
No, I've been too busy working on the FAD
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
[ ] I vote for Peter B. West as PMC chair.
[X] I vote for Jeremias Maerki as PMC chair.
J.Pietschmann
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- From an app: add a configuration object to the
FOUseragent object,
Why do you need to drag in the Avalon library for
this? For the classes in question, Avalon is just
providing a very thin wrapper--can't we do this
directly against the JDK?
Glen
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, was, I hope. I have just committed code which
enables using a
user configuration file and adding fonts from it.
Thanks, Simon. Its good that we have people of your
skill on our team.
Glen
Team,
There are two possible API changes I am wondering if
we should make. I'm thinking about longer-term market
share of our 1.0 product, even if things get rocky for
us for a few months. Simon's changes are making the
HEAD code in FOP close to being useful, and so we may
have a narrowing
Glen Mazza wrote:
Team,
...
1.) Drop the apps.Driver class and incorporate its
remaining code into apps.Fop.
Reason: Fop appears to be a better self-documenting
class name within user's embedded code. It's also a
neat name for a product. User's code would move from
looking like this:
//
10 matches
Mail list logo