DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33174] New: - An unrecognized token'NaN' was found when opening pdf file with Acrobat Reader 6.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174 Summary: An unrecognized token'NaN' was found when opening pdf file with Acrobat Reader 6.0 Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] During converting the fo file to pdf file , all seem to be ok. Although there are some errors and warnings, all are about unimplemented property. Then I open the pdf, and the Reader told me that an unrecognized token'NaN' was found when opening pdf file . But the file is still be opened with the exception of that the first page is blank. The strcuture of the fo file is very simple, only a table. It has a header, footer and body. Under the header and footer, there is only one row. But there are over more than 2000 rows enclosed in the table body. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Background images
Team, I'm going to implement background images as one of my next steps. I found that even in 1.1 WD there's no way to scale the background image. Should we skip that or should we define our own properties? Maybe Glen wants to talk to the WG about that. Jeremias Maerki
RE: Cause for Too many arguments in Adobe Reader 7?
Ok, I guess I can answer that one now myself. Looks as those having the problem are running an old version of FOP - as this bug error: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9054 seems to be exactly that. Matthew -- SN AG Competence Center Open Source Klingenderstr. 5 D 33100 Paderborn voice +49 5251/1581-30 fax+49 5251/1581-71 eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webhttp://www.s-und-n.de - Wincor World 2005 - Vision at Work Besuchen Sie unseren Gold-Partnerstand vom 25.-27.01.05 in Paderborn - -Original Message- From: Matthew Langham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:18 PM To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Cause for Too many arguments in Adobe Reader 7? Hi, A few people seem to be having problems opening FOP generated PDFs with the new Adobe Reader 7. They basically get an error message There were too many arguments and after closing the error box, the document is displayed normally. To date I have not seen an answer to this and therefore posted the problem again to the Adobe support forum. And I received a reply that basically states there is an error in the PDF - the whole anser is here: http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx?50@@.3bb7ebc6/1!login=true Just Login as Guest to read the thread. The author of the answer also points here as to the cause: http://multivalent.sourceforge.net/news.html workarounds for buggy PDF generators ... FOP 0.20.3 inserts the Tc PDF operator in the middle of the TJ operator Can someone from the FOP team give me a heads-up on this - and is there a fix? And I apologize if this has already been discussed somewhere - just point me there. Thanks Matthew Langham
Re: Background images
On Jan 20, 2005, at 2:19 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Team, I'm going to implement background images as one of my next steps. I found that even in 1.1 WD there's no way to scale the background image. Should we skip that or should we define our own properties? Maybe Glen wants to talk to the WG about that. Jeremias Maerki +1 for enabling this attribute/feature. Since that's something that is oft-requested (well, considering how many requests we get), I think it's a good idea to implement this. Perhaps, since it's not part of the 1.0 or 1.1 spec (yet), it should be made as an extension (although i don't know how this would work since it's an attribute... maybe by enabling content-width content-height?)? Web Maestro Clay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/ My religion is simple. My religion is kindness. - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
Re: Background images
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Team, I'm going to implement background images as one of my next steps. Good. I found that even in 1.1 WD there's no way to scale the background image. Jeremias, please do another scan first of the 1.1 document--thankfully it's all in one HTML file--search for both scale and scaling throughout to (1) make sure that is the case (there appear to be some new properties and even formatting objects related to scaling), and (2) to see if there is any scaling logic that you're contemplating that may be applicable in other areas as well. Next, you may wish to check the AntennaHouse and RenderX extension element/attribute list. There may be something you can learn there about background scaling, also when you send emails to the xsl-editors list saying [insert commercial company here] already does this, etc., it will carry more weight. Should we skip that or should we define our own properties? I don't care either way. Although I don't understand why the specification doesn't already handle background image scaling. Something is rotten in the State of Denmark here--this would seem to be a common need. Maybe Glen wants to talk to the WG about that. Would be delighted. But imaging issues are beyond my scope, and it's about time the WG learn more about you as well. Please do so, also mention that you're from FOP as well please. (Not that you need my permission.) (This is gonna be great--with both of us sending comments to the W3C, we can use a good-cop/bad-cop technique to persuade them. Guess which role I want to play? ;) Thanks, Glen
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33164] - ArrayIndexOutOfBounds on extern graphic in PCL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33164. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33164 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-20 19:50 --- (In reply to comment #1) This is a known issue. The PCL Renderer is very primitive, see the website for more info on limitations: http://xml.apache.org/fop/output.html#pcl Okay, thanks. I saw that, but it didn't say that images wouldn't be rendered, just that they'd be monochrome and not rendered properly if outside the printable area. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: Background images
On 20.01.2005 19:37:06 Glen Mazza wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Team, I'm going to implement background images as one of my next steps. Good. I found that even in 1.1 WD there's no way to scale the background image. Jeremias, please do another scan first of the 1.1 document--thankfully it's all in one HTML file--search for both scale and scaling throughout to (1) make sure that is the case (there appear to be some new properties and even formatting objects related to scaling), and (2) to see if there is any scaling logic that you're contemplating that may be applicable in other areas as well. Thanks for the tip. The scan turned up empty. All scaling enhancements seem to apply to external-graphic only. Next, you may wish to check the AntennaHouse and RenderX extension element/attribute list. There may be something you can learn there about background scaling, also when you send emails to the xsl-editors list saying [insert commercial company here] already does this, etc., it will carry more weight. I've seen the RenderX extensions. It's really surprising that RenderX didn't manage to bring that in, yet. Should we skip that or should we define our own properties? I don't care either way. Although I don't understand why the specification doesn't already handle background image scaling. Something is rotten in the State of Denmark here--this would seem to be a common need. Maybe Glen wants to talk to the WG about that. Would be delighted. But imaging issues are beyond my scope, and it's about time the WG learn more about you as well. Please do so, also mention that you're from FOP as well please. (Not that you need my permission.) (This is gonna be great--with both of us sending comments to the W3C, we can use a good-cop/bad-cop technique to persuade them. Guess which role I want to play? ;) LOL! I'll try to write something, but I guess I have some other priorities first. I'll probably also skip these scaling things for now. This can be added later. My enhancement to parse the bitmap resolution might also help a bit in the meantime. Jeremias Maerki
Re: commit to fop
jeremias and simon: thanks for your response. now i see better where to look. i'll follow the maillinglist start to dig in the code. renaud
