cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo FOTreeBuilder.java

2002-11-16 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/11/16 17:40:20 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain FOTreeBuilder.java Log: Line ending fixes. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.30.2.6 +285 -285 xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14489] - [PATCH] small workaround for outputHeader called two times

2002-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14489] - [PATCH] small workaround for outputHeader called two times

2002-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14489] - [PATCH] small workaround for outputHeader called two times

2002-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14489] - [PATCH] small workaround for outputHeader called two times

2002-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Frustration With FOP

2002-11-16 Thread Victor Mote
W. Eliot Kimber wrote: > My frustration stems from the fact that FOP, as good as it is, is simply > not ready for general use--it implements too few features of FO and has > too many implementation bugs to be considered a candidate for any sort > of production use except in the most constrained us

Frustration With FOP

2002-11-16 Thread W. Eliot Kimber
I feel a need to say something about my frustration with FOP, because I think it's a potential issue for the XSL FO world in general and it concerns me, especially as a person who's working very hard to try to advance the acceptance and use of FO, both through educating potential users and work

RE: Getting breaks: revisited

2002-11-16 Thread Rhett Aultman
Response Below. -Original Message- From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 7:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Getting breaks: revisited >>Victor Mote wrote: > It seems to me that there are (at least) two approaches: 1. A leaf on the > tree