On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 21:56, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
btw, how does such a case addressed by the spec? Apparently FOP, antenna
and xep do squeeze content. Isn't it an example of overconstrained
geometry (5.3.4)?
It can be interpreted as such in the presented case. Use
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15048.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3044.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
sri vela wrote:
I would like to know about fop alt.design. Where can i
find the documentation for this? will it change the
entire old design ro part of it? What should i do to
involve in alt.design.
It's http://xml.apache.org/fop/design/alt.design/index.html
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Hello together,
i'm looking for the current cvs version of the maintenance branch
(0.20.5). I have no possiblity to get it through CVS (our firewall
blocks that). Is there another way to get the source of the current version?
--
regards
Timo Haberkern
EMEDIA OFFICE GmbH
Wingertstr. 4
74850
Timo Haberkern wrote:
i'm looking for the current cvs version of the maintenance branch
(0.20.5). I have no possiblity to get it through CVS (our firewall
blocks that). Is there another way to get the source of the current
version?
afaik, no way. Nightly snapshots hold the trunk code. Ask
Hello there!
What do you think about http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13586?
Stefan asks us to use something like
float currentLetterSpacing = (float) 9.99;
instead of
float currentLetterSpacing = Float.NaN
in PDFRenderer.java due to jre-1.3.1 for linux-alpha bug.
For me
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
I noticed that the apache project uses mostly XML files for configuration.
Personally I prefer using .properties files because then I don't have the
overhead of parsing the file each time. So what's the advantage of using
XML files?
Thanks for any answers...
Roland
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8635.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12268.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12864.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13295.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13451.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema
in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know
what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations?
Thanks.
Victor Mote
Hello there!
Well, bugzilla shake-up is over, sorry if I closed something not-to-be-closed
or leave something-to-be-closed, but anyway I believe we can say bugzilla is
cleaned up now.
Now it's 111 entries in there (it was 188 IIRC):
Blockers: 3
Criticals: 6
Majors: 17
Normals:
Victor Mote wrote:
While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema
in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know
what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations?
I think fop4f.xsd is the latest one. Anyway Chuck Paussa
Victor Mote wrote:
While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema
in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know
what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations?
Victor,
I think that Chuck was appending a letter to
Arved Sandstrom wrote:
You're being absolutely honest, which is cool - I'll be absolutely honest
also. It seems to me like the mainstream rewrite is in trouble. Very few
people understand it or have [clearly] bought into it. This is no comment on
its technical merits, by any means.
OTOH, only
19 matches
Mail list logo
