Re: replace extension bookmarks with XSL 1.1 ones?

2004-12-17 Thread Chris Bowditch
Glen Mazza wrote:
They're coming very close (I suspect in a few weeks at
the latest) to having a Last Call version--would it
be acceptable for you at that stage?  I don't mind
waiting a little longer.
Second edition of working Draft was released today :-)
snip/
Chris


Re: FontServer cleanup (FOray)

2004-12-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Victor,

just had a look at the package (in CVS). I think you're on the right
track with this one. Good work so far. Definitely makes me avoid putting
any refactoring to the font subsystem in FOP CVS HEAD on my todo list
for next year. :-) We'll talk about that again in a few weeks.

On 16.12.2004 18:00:51 Victor Mote wrote:
 Hi Jeremias and any others interested:
 
 I finally got around to cleaning up the static nature of the FOray
 FontServer class. It now can be and must be instantiated, and I agree that
 this is a cleaner approach.
 
 One of the main reasons that I hung on to the static-ish stuff is that I
 didn't want to tote the FontServer around everywhere that Fonts were needed.
 To avoid this, the FontServer instance is encapsulated in the FontConsumer
 implementation. The FontConsumer still (as before) needs to be available
 anywhere that font services are needed. Within FOray, this is pretty easily
 accomplished by caching it once at the top of the tree and using recursive
 methods to get to it, so font-related services are pretty unobtrusive.


Jeremias Maerki



Re: replace extension bookmarks with XSL 1.1 ones?

2004-12-17 Thread Glen Mazza
face color=red/  ;-)

--- Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Glen Mazza wrote:
 
  They're coming very close (I suspect in a few
 weeks at
  the latest) to having a Last Call version--would
 it
  be acceptable for you at that stage?  I don't mind
  waiting a little longer.
 
 Second edition of working Draft was released today
 :-)
 
 snip/
 
 Chris