Newbie attempting to help

2001-08-06 Thread Don Wellington
, until I figure how to get FOP to obey the keep_with_next when there is an external-graphics as the first element in the list-item-body. Anything wrong with that? Any pointers in the right direction? Don Wellington __ Do You Yahoo!? Make

Re: Using FOP 0.19-CVS to create PDF

2001-08-09 Thread Don Wellington
My firewall does not allow IP tunneling. Without that even WinCVS doesn't help. Don --- Alex McLintock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Don Wellington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Arved- It is with FOP-0.19 not the latest CVS. I am stuck behind a firewall, so CVS is not really

table-and-caption problem?

2001-08-21 Thread Don Wellington
Hi- I think this is a bad precendent. In FOP 0.19 fo:table-and-caption produces a table. But, in FOP 0.20.1 fo:table-and-caption is reported as being unsupported in this version, and produces no output. Why? Is that really a good idea? Don

Re: keep-with-next problem on multi column text

2001-08-29 Thread Don Wellington
Hi Arved- I submitted patches against 20.1 to do an effective keep-with-next on list-item-label and list-item-body, except I assumed an implied keep-with-next on list-item-label. I would be glad to work with bodo on this time permitting. It would probably be best, so that there are not two

Re: keep-with-next problem on multi column text

2001-08-30 Thread Don Wellington
Hi Arved- I didn't get any reply that the patch was comitted, and I am stuck behind a firewall that doesn't allow IP tunneling. So, I don't have access to the CVS repository. Don --- Arved Sandstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure, absolutely, I'll help out as a resource. Did your patch get

Re: keep-with-next problem on multi column text

2001-08-30 Thread Don Wellington
Hi Bodo- First, I don't think I qualify as better overlooking FOP, since my one and only contribution is getting that list-item thing to do what I wanted. But, here are some things I found out during that process, and answered below: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Don, Arved

FYI: Fop 0.19 JPEG-Patch

2001-09-17 Thread Don Wellington
It appears to work with FOP 0.19 for people who are using older versions of FOP. Took my picture intensive PDF from 35MB to 4MB. Don __ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information