I'm surprised that we haven't always acknowledged contributions, at the
option of the contributor. I suppose there are a number of questions
that arise, and I wonder if the ASF has considered this question. For
example, the Xerces and Xalan development is heavy with IBM personnel,
yet I see n
There are pros and cons:
+ Might encourage other companies also to support FOP.
+ Gives credit where credit is due.
- As with the contributor's list, if we start the list now, we don't
acknowledge former contributions. And completing such a list is some
tedious work. Just missing former contrib
Jeremias,
Shouldn't we acknowledge this support on the web site?
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Fix bug in WinAnsiEncoding: trademark was shown as bullet
Financed by: CTB/McGraw-Hill
--
Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html
--
jeremias2003/06/02 14:38:39
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fonts Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
Glyphs.java
Log:
Reestablish JDK 1.3 compatibility. Sorry!
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.7.2
jeremias2003/06/02 12:52:51
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fonts Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
Glyphs.java
Log:
Fix bug in WinAnsiEncoding: trademark was shown as bullet
Financed by: CTB/McGraw-Hill
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
jeremias2002/11/29 00:37:37
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fonts Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
Glyphs.java
Log:
Made the rest of the constants public.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.7.2.1
gears 01/07/31 14:27:28
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fonts Glyphs.java
Log:
Fixed my own dump typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fonts/Glyphs.java
Index: Glyphs.java
=
