OK, if it helps you and if you suspect it will help
others understand the system better, perhaps not such
a bad idea.
Glen
--- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glen,
>
> Comments below, but to preface, let me say that
> alt.design has not had
> an Ant build system to date, so there
Glen,
Comments below, but to preface, let me say that alt.design has not had
an Ant build system to date, so there is no penalty in my doing things
differently, because I have to hack the build.xml anyway. What I do
does not impact on HEAD, and provides a testbed for examining a
different app
Ralph LaChance wrote:
> At 12:20 PM 7/4/2003, you wrote:
> >[Happy Independence Day, fellow Americans!]
>
> and I always like to remind fellow Americans that
> the British call this "Thanksgiving Day"...
Yep, and we're thankful for Washington et al who made them thankful :-)
Victor Mote
--
At 12:20 PM 7/4/2003, you wrote:
[Happy Independence Day, fellow Americans!]
and I always like to remind fellow Americans that
the British call this "Thanksgiving Day"...
' Best,
-Ralph LaChance
In theory, there is no difference between
theory and practice, but i
[Happy Independence Day, fellow Americans!]
--- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The basic build principles that I will implement
> include:
>
> * No code generation or modification for normal
> builds.
> * All generated code and data maintained in CVS.
>
I don't think you have to b
Fopdevs,
I am in the process of giving alt.design an Ant build environment, based
on the HEAD environment, with a number of significnt changes.
The basic build principles that I will implement include:
* No code generation or modification for normal builds.
* All generated code and data maintai
