Re: Documentation conventions
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I know I'm getting troublesome, but here's another observation. On our website we have at least 3 different ways to mention our beloved "Extensible Stylesheet Language Formatting Objects": - XSL:FO (I'm guilty of using this in the past) - XSL-FO - FO (each in upper- and lowercase) I believe the official one is XSL-FO (uppercase), so could please each I think XSL is the offical term but XSL-FO has become the defacto standard. [..] Some consistency will make our site a bit nicer. :-) +1 Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Documentation conventions
Ah, yes, and it's FOP, not Fop, I believe. :-) Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Documentation conventions
I know I'm getting troublesome, but here's another observation. On our website we have at least 3 different ways to mention our beloved "Extensible Stylesheet Language Formatting Objects": - XSL:FO (I'm guilty of using this in the past) - XSL-FO - FO (each in upper- and lowercase) I believe the official one is XSL-FO (uppercase), so could please each of you fix "illegal" occurences as they get discovered. Thanks. There are a similar issues with: - PDF, SVG, PCL etc. (always use uppercase) - PostScript (be mindful of the capital S) Some consistency will make our site a bit nicer. :-) Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
