To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop-maintenance has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop-maintenance has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi Sergey,
that certainly sounds better although I'm not sure I really understand
why exactly you need to do these refinements. I assume that the
TextRenderer will also work for most cases without the special
AreaTreeHandler. I'm looking forward to having a look at your patch when
it's ready.
On
Hi,
A question: I noticed that the warning about tables having padding and
border-collapse=collapse has been commented out recently, since
hasPadding() now requires context.
Can anyone explain why precisely this was done? IOW: why does a
PercentBaseContext *always* need to be provided? Why
Hi,
Another question related to page-height and page-width properties on
simple-page-master:
The Rec states that, in case the value is specified as auto:
The 'page-height/-width' shall be determined, in the case of
continuous media, from the size of the User Agent window, otherwise
from the
Hi Jeremias,
May be it's impossible to understand our idea perfectly. Furthermore, we
still haven't ICLA and so we can't commit patch with new file (unfortunately
such file is 'TxtHandler.java').
Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
(Apologies for the many posts... I'm definitely on a roll :-))
Now that it has been made clear to me that the layout-engine first
calculates *all* break-possibilities, IMO this also seems to make
implementing page-position=last much, much easier.
Assuming that no areas are generated
On Sep 23, 2005, at 18:12, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
It almost makes it seem as if padding always needs to be specified as
a percentage-width, or somehow a fixed-length is always interpreted as
the specified fixed-length * 100%...?
Or, more correctly: as if the fixed-length is
On Sep 23, 2005, at 18:32, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Now, I was thinking, since currently the fallback values are used as
defaults --which, strictly speaking, is wrong-- maybe the first step
towards implementing auto could be to define these fallbacks in
fop.xconf (?)
Duh! I mean, we
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 03:45 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Sep 23, 2005, at 18:12, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
It almost makes it seem as if padding always needs to be specified
as a percentage-width, or somehow a fixed-length is always
interpreted as the specified fixed-length *
10 matches
Mail list logo