Andreas L Delmelle writes:
> > All the property
> > classes are supposed to be immutable even though some of them
> > aren't and
> > none of them use final members. Is this all correct so far?
>
> True, and this could be much improved, I'd say...
OK. I'll take a look at it. Whilst I'm at
On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An excellent idea. However, before I go any further with implementing
anything I'd like to make sure that I actually understand what's going
on at the moment and (more importantly) what should be going on.
As I understand it, objects in the f
Andreas L Delmelle writes:
> OTOH, if you feel like investigating further, I personally would be
> very interested to see if the properties implementation cannot be
> optimized in other ways than simply removing them as members from the
> FOs.
>
> I recently mentioned the idea of flywe
