Re: FO snippets for unit testing

2007-02-13 Thread Simon Pepping
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 08:04:00PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Many thanks Andreas, that was enough to get me started! > I've just committed a first test case for tables. This is still very > rough, there's no testsuite, that won't be called by ant, but as long as > I can run the tests from E

Re: FO snippets for unit testing

2007-02-13 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit : > On Feb 12, 2007, at 20:02, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2007, at 18:00, Vincent Hennebert wrote: >>> So my question is: is there a possibility of creating a tree of FObj >>> instances from a corresponding FO fragment, and use it to feed objects >>> from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41514] - [PATCH] Strict url validation of user config

2007-02-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41514] - [PATCH] Strict url validation of user config

2007-02-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Officially supported version of the Recommendation

2007-02-13 Thread Chris Bowditch
Vincent Hennebert wrote: Guys, It may be worth clarifying which version of XSL-FO we officially support, now that 1.1 has reached the status of a recommendation. I guess we can now take it as a reference, since it clears some uncertainties of the 1.0 version. I've just noticed that I'm myself s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41514] - [PATCH] Strict url validation of user config

2007-02-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Officially supported version of the Recommendation

2007-02-13 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Guys, It may be worth clarifying which version of XSL-FO we officially support, now that 1.1 has reached the status of a recommendation. I guess we can now take it as a reference, since it clears some uncertainties of the 1.0 version. I've just noticed that I'm myself still looking at the 1.0 copy