Salut Guillaume
Wrong recipient perhaps? :-)
To answer your question: The development happens in a temporary branch
[1]. It'll soon be finished and merged into the Trunk. Some parts may go
the XML Graphics Commons.
[1]
Salut Patrice,
Pour info,
je viens de recevoir cette email. J'ai l'impression que l'équipe FOP fait pas
mal de changement dans le chargement / traitement des images. je ne suis pas
sûre si leur changement est dans foptrunk ou dans une autre branche.
-Message d'origine-
De : Apache
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I’m planning to send a bunch of clarification requests to xsl-editors@
in the next days. While I’m at it we may also ask for clarification on
this topic, unless there is something I missed (I must admit that for
one time every XSL-FO implementation I’ve tried does the same).
Jeremias
Vincent,
Just a quick question coming from someone who has absolutely no clue about
what you are really doing and just based on the commit comment.
We have been 'bitten' before by moving things into the fo tree only to find
out that it doesn't work when it comes to fo:markers as they inherit the
I see no reason to change anything unless the XSL WG clarifies in one
direction or the other.
On 13.12.2007 20:47:06 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
I’m planning to send a bunch of clarification requests to xsl-editors@
in the next days. While I’m at it we may also ask for clarification on
11 matches
Mail list logo
