Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44412] Missing border-after when break-after set on a block

2008-05-16 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Andreas Delmelle wrote: On May 15, 2008, at 12:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Comment #25 from Vincent Hennebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-15 03:53:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #18) page, along with the inner block, in attachment #21531 [details]. I think our best bet is to ask for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #34 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 06:16:07 PST --- Update: Adrian contacted me off-list to see if we could at least partially apply the attached patches. My proposal would be to integrate the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45019] New: Wrong entries in the maven pom

2008-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45019 Summary: Wrong entries in the maven pom Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: All URL: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xmlgraphics/fop

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #35 from Adrian Cumiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:37:11 PST --- I think this patch should only be applied when it is ready, looks like there is still quite a bit of cleanup to do. Lets try and have a model that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #36 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:23:54 PST --- (In reply to comment #35) I think this patch should only be applied when it is ready, looks like there is still quite a bit of cleanup to do.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #37 from Vincent Hennebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 10:16:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #36) (In reply to comment #35) I think this patch should only be applied when it is ready, looks like there is still

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #38 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:29:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #37) I'm sorry to chime in so late, but so far I haven't had the time and energy to approach this topic. No problem.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

2008-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #39 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:37:29 PST --- (In reply to comment #38) snip / Now that you mention it... The current implementation has the related code (footnote gathering) in