On 09/02/2012 05:31, Suvrat Hiran wrote:
Hi Experts,
Hi Suvrat,
First of all questions on FOP's usage are best sent to
fop-us...@xmlgraphics.apache.org not the developer's mailing list. All
the developers subscribe to both lists.
Does Apache FOP support drop down menus or expandable
Hi,
As I've said previously, I've been looking at unifying URI resolution,
I've looked at a lot of the code regarding this and from what I can
see FOP uses file access for the following types of files:
1) Input/Output files - by that I mean FO and output, both of which
are many-to-many
2)
Hi,
Thomas Dörr thomas.doerr at haufe-lexware.net writes:
But I'd prefer continuing to
use FOP.
Same here, FOP served us very well in the past and there is no reason to switch…
We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of
course we'd pay for that implementation.
Let
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
--- Comment #6 from Santanu Dutta icyl...@gmail.com 2012-02-10 05:52:31 UTC
---
Created attachment 28296
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28296
data_files
Test files re-submitted in order to look inside this
