I fat-fingered the reply button instead of reply-to-all... *face-palm*
-- Forwarded message --
From: mehdi houshmand med1...@gmail.com
Date: 6 March 2012 09:33
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code
To: Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au
On 6 March 2012 00:16, Craig Ringer
-- Forwarded message --
From: mehdi houshmand med1...@gmail.com
Date: 6 March 2012 10:12
Subject: Fwd: Google Summer of Code
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
I fat-fingered the reply button instead of reply-to-all... *face-palm*
-- Forwarded message --
From
On 06/03/2012 10:12, mehdi houshmand wrote:
I fat-fingered the reply button instead of reply-to-all... *face-palm*
Mehdi, Craig,
snip/
- Anything in the proposed XSL-FO 2.0 feature list (though most of it won't
be realistic for GSoC projects);
- Merge fop-pdf-image and implement smart
Font de-duping is intrinsically a post-process action, you need the
full document, with all fonts, before you can do any font de-duping.
PostScript does this very thing (to a much lesser extent) with the
optimize-resources tag, as a post-process action.
Also, the requirements aren't clear here,
On 06/03/2012 11:08, mehdi houshmand wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
Font de-duping is intrinsically a post-process action, you need the
full document, with all fonts, before you can do any font de-duping.
PostScript does this very thing (to a much lesser extent) with the
optimize-resources tag, as a
My reply is interleaved below, but there's something important to cover
before reading on.
There's clearly a difference in what I mean by de-duplication vs what
you're thinking I mean by de-duplication. As far as I can tell you're
looking at font substitution and un/re-embedding, where (eg)
On 03/06/2012 07:29 PM, Chris Bowditch wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:08, mehdi houshmand wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
Font de-duping is intrinsically a post-process action, you need the
full document, with all fonts, before you can do any font de-duping.
PostScript does this very thing (to a much lesser
