Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm going to do one last change before the merge: Vincent told me last
week that the Factory classes in the event producers should rather be
something like getters (or providers) since the returned instances
may be cached and reused. A factory usually creates a new
Thanks that now works fine for me :).
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
You need to run the build at least to target resourcegen, i.e. ant
resourcegen. That generated the event-model.xml.
On 14.04.2008 17:09:49 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
I couldn't find event-model.xml anywhere.. have I
Vote passes: 8 +1s, no other votes.
I'm going to do one last change before the merge: Vincent told me last
week that the Factory classes in the event producers should rather be
something like getters (or providers) since the returned instances
may be cached and reused. A factory usually creates a
Hi Jeremias,
I couldn't find event-model.xml anywhere.. have I missed something?
Exception in thread main java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at org.apache.fop.apps.FOUserAgent.init(FOUserAgent.java:98)
at org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.newFOUserAgent(FopFactory.java:177)
You need to run the build at least to target resourcegen, i.e. ant
resourcegen. That generated the event-model.xml.
On 14.04.2008 17:09:49 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
I couldn't find event-model.xml anywhere.. have I missed something?
Exception in thread main
Good stuff, +1
Vincent
Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
I'm camping in Big Sur, California, without a laptop so can't test...
But I trust your work.
+1 from me
Web Maestro Clay
On 4/5/08, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This
Jeremias,
On Sam, 2008-04-05 at 16:33 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
[1]
Voting on this feels a little bit like shooting myself in the foot as I'm
sure it will cause me some merge work on the branch I'm working on... but +1
:).
Adrian.
On 07/04/2008, Christian Geisert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call
*g* I don't think it's so bad. Only one event method in AFP:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_ProcessingFeedback/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/afp/AFPEventProducer.java?view=markup
On 07.04.2008 17:00:55 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Voting on this feels a little bit like
On Apr 5, 2008, at 16:33, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
[1]
13 matches
Mail list logo
