On 05.03.2006 21:55:44 Simon Pepping wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 10:22:39PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 22.02.2006 21:55:36 Simon Pepping wrote:
Would it not be nicer to have a constructor that takes the output
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 10:22:39PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 22.02.2006 21:55:36 Simon Pepping wrote:
Would it not be nicer to have a constructor that takes the output
stream as an argument?
If this is
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 10:22:39PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 22.02.2006 21:55:36 Simon Pepping wrote:
Would it not be nicer to have a constructor that takes the output
stream as an argument?
If this is preferred, no objections. However, not all output formats take
an OutputStream
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:50:57PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: spepping
Date: Wed Feb 22 12:50:56 2006
New Revision: 379883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379883view=rev
Log:
Adapted this example to the new API.
Modified:
