Re: svn commit: r961399

2010-07-12 Thread Pascal Sancho
Filled a bug entry to keep track of this: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49583 Pascal Le 10/07/2010 16:18, Simon Pepping a écrit : On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:10:48AM +0200, Pascal Sancho wrote: Hi Simon, Le 07/07/2010 17:13, Simon Pepping a écrit :

Re: svn commit: r961399

2010-07-10 Thread Simon Pepping
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:10:48AM +0200, Pascal Sancho wrote: Hi Simon, Le 07/07/2010 17:13, Simon Pepping a écrit : xdocs/upgrading.xml is completely outdated. Do we need a new upgrading document, or shall we delete it? Whatever the FOP tab, the page is quite the same (except

Re: svn commit: r961399

2010-07-08 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hi Simon, Le 07/07/2010 17:13, Simon Pepping a écrit : This completes the documentation for the release. Note the following points: Rewrote xdocs/status.xml. Removed all references to the 0.20 versions. Removed all links to 0.94 and earlier. xdocs/upgrading.xml is completely outdated. Do

Re: svn commit: r961399

2010-07-07 Thread Simon Pepping
This completes the documentation for the release. Note the following points: Rewrote xdocs/status.xml. Removed all references to the 0.20 versions. Removed all links to 0.94 and earlier. xdocs/upgrading.xml is completely outdated. Do we need a new upgrading document, or shall we delete it? faq