DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19341.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I just converted the bgimg300dpi.jpg image using Photoshop into PNG,
BMP, EPS, TIF and GIF formats and tried to include those as e-g.
PNG and TIF seem to be working although they are shown at a different
size than the original JPEG. EPS shows blank. BMP and GIF cause
exceptions.
Is this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 09.08.2005 11:55:55 Manuel Mall wrote:
Hi,
I just converted the bgimg300dpi.jpg image using Photoshop into PNG,
BMP, EPS, TIF and GIF formats and tried to include those as e-g.
PNG and TIF seem to be working although they are shown at a different
size than the original JPEG.
Please
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
BMP and GIF cause
exceptions.
That's not so good.
Bad news indeed.
Is this something worthwhile to further investigate or are these known
issues not considered important at the moment?
I consider this relatively important. There are certain problems in
image
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:21 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 09.08.2005 11:55:55 Manuel Mall wrote:
snip /
PNG and TIF seem to be working although they are shown at a
different size than the original JPEG.
Please check that the DPI/resolution settings in the different
versions of the file are
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
My name is Patrick Paul and I just joined the fop-dev mailing list.
As a first contribution to the project, I would like to extend the
compliance document to show 1.0dev capabilities and allow comparison
between 0.20.5 and 1.0dev.
Afterwards I hope to extend the documentation in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DummyConnection triggers an unpleasant memory. Look here:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33383
So, no, unfortunately, no ideas from this time. :-(
On 09.08.2005 17:26:04 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:15 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 09.08.2005 13:57:09 Manuel
Jeremias Maerki writes:
AFAIK, noones currently working on that otherwise. Most of the
dispatching of the render*() calls is done in AbstractRenderer. So this
should actually be renderer-independent. But still, there seems to be
something wrong. I'd have to do some debugging myself to find
Thank you for the update Jeremias!
And welcome Manuel! I (we? :-p) appreciate the help!
On Aug 9, 2005, at 7:39 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Jim Jagielski has just confirmed the receipt of the Manuel's CLA.
Thanks, Manuel.
Regards,
Web Maestro Clay
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
16 matches
Mail list logo