block-container compliance

2006-01-15 Thread Manuel Mall
Just stumbled across this on our compliance page. For block-container we say in the compliance column for 0.91 'partial' but in the comment it says '[0.91 beta] No known restrictions'. Who is right? Manuel

Re: table-columns and number-columns-spanned

2006-01-15 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Jan 12, 2006, at 21:55, gerhard oettl wrote: from Andreas L. Delmelle I see you made the same mistake (?) in interpretation of the Rec that I initially made: the Rec states literally that the column-number for a fo:table-column is 1 plus the column-number of the previous column

Re: block-container compliance

2006-01-15 Thread Manuel Mall
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:40 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Probably the partial indicator. Please review the following thread: http://www.nabble.com/Preparing-for-the-first-release---Examples-t542 439.html#a1461388 (especially the part where we realized that the spec changed in a

Re: block-container compliance

2006-01-15 Thread Manuel Mall
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:28 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Mostly a compliance issue. If you look at it from the XSL-1.1 POV, it's probably a bug, too. ATM, I'm unsure what to do. We probably need to verify that we understand the spec concerning the top/left properties on absolutely positioned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37725] - NullPointerException in -rtf only (not pdf, txt, png..)

2006-01-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37725. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: table-columns and number-columns-spanned

2006-01-15 Thread gerhard oettl
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:56:54AM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Jan 12, 2006, at 21:55, gerhard oettl wrote: from Andreas L. Delmelle I see you made the same mistake (?) in interpretation of the Rec that I initially made: the Rec states literally that the column-number for a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38282] New: - [patch] from-table-column implementation

2006-01-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38282. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Bug report for Fop [2006/01/15]

2006-01-15 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38282] - [patch] from-table-column implementation

2006-01-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38282. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.