DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
I don't know if you noticed but i posted a patch for the support of the
PNCL element last week, and i was hoping for some feedback to know if i
could develop another feature of FOP :)
I spoke with my teacher and he would be interested that i do the auto
table layout property (basic
Pierre-Henri,
I did see the patch and it's on the top of my list, but with the 0.92
release and a few other things I had too much going on in my head. I can
look at your patch during the weekend. I'm sorry for the delay.
So many years and noone wanted to do auto table layout, and now, we have
I'm a little confused on the subversion FOP vs. the binary download.
- The .92 beta binary uses 'FopFactory' to create a Fop instance (which I can't get to work anyway, which is why I tried the subversion)
- The subversion uses the 'new Fop' object constructor(no FopFactory)
- The .92 beta
On 21.04.2006 19:42:48 Will Peterson wrote:
I'm a little confused on the subversion FOP vs. the binary download.
- The .92 beta binary uses 'FopFactory' to create a Fop instance (which
I can't get to work anyway, which is why I tried the subversion)
- The subversion uses the 'new Fop'
Jeremias,
I wrote some of the code whilst working at my current employer, however
a significant amount was completed in my own time subsequent to them
donating the code to SourceForge - at this time I was the sole
developer so no other ICLA's should be required.
They agreed to the donation so
