DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43070.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43070.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43070.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 08:30, Manuel Mall wrote:
snip /
Not quite my point. When you put your private implementation of an int
HashMap forward there were concerns raised about this as hard to
maintain and not really required. Now we have a custom implementation
of a concurrent hash map. Same
On Aug 8, 2007, at 18:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
-public int getValue() {
-log.error(getValue() called on + enumProperty +
number);
-return 0;
That may be discussed, but I have strong feelings against that. If the
method shouldn’t be called, why not throw an
On Aug 9, 2007, at 19:00, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Aug 8, 2007, at 08:30, Manuel Mall wrote:
snip /
Not quite my point. When you put your private implementation of an
int
HashMap forward there were concerns raised about this as hard to
maintain and not really required. Now we have a
Hi,
Below’s what I get when trying to build FOP with a 1.3 jdk. Does anyone
have an idea? That 1.3 build gets on my nerve...
Building with 1.4 and setting binary compatibility to 1.3 should be
sufficient, no?
Anyway, I’ve just noticed that I forgot to put the new XML Graphics
Commons jar in
... I'm sorry. That didn't make sense.
Could you please repeat it, using something more closely resembling actual
English? I don't actually understand your point or even what your sentences
are trying to say.
As to the point on CSS, nobody wants to use a broken CSS renderer. They
simply have
12 matches
Mail list logo