DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42144] - [PATCH] Safely set postscript page device dictionary, additional processing states for OffDocumentItems

2007-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42144] - [PATCH] Safely set postscript page device dictionary, additional processing states for OffDocumentItems

2007-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43070] New: - [PATCH] Postscript extension : comment before and after page

2007-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43070. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43070] - [PATCH] Postscript extension : comment before and after page

2007-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43070. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42144] - [PATCH] Safely set postscript page device dictionary, additional processing states for OffDocumentItems

2007-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42144] - [PATCH] Safely set postscript page device dictionary

2007-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43070] - [PATCH] Postscript extension : comment before and after page

2007-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43070. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: More about the effects of the PropertyCache

2007-08-09 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Aug 8, 2007, at 08:30, Manuel Mall wrote: snip / Not quite my point. When you put your private implementation of an int HashMap forward there were concerns raised about this as hard to maintain and not really required. Now we have a custom implementation of a concurrent hash map. Same

Re: svn commit: r558045 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties: EnumNumber.java EnumProperty.java NumberProperty.java StringProperty.java

2007-08-09 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Aug 8, 2007, at 18:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote: -public int getValue() { -log.error(getValue() called on + enumProperty + number); -return 0; That may be discussed, but I have strong feelings against that. If the method shouldn’t be called, why not throw an

Re: More about the effects of the PropertyCache

2007-08-09 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Aug 9, 2007, at 19:00, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Aug 8, 2007, at 08:30, Manuel Mall wrote: snip / Not quite my point. When you put your private implementation of an int HashMap forward there were concerns raised about this as hard to maintain and not really required. Now we have a

Cannot build with JDK 1.3

2007-08-09 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, Below’s what I get when trying to build FOP with a 1.3 jdk. Does anyone have an idea? That 1.3 build gets on my nerve... Building with 1.4 and setting binary compatibility to 1.3 should be sufficient, no? Anyway, I’ve just noticed that I forgot to put the new XML Graphics Commons jar in

Re: Drop RTF Support?

2007-08-09 Thread Nicol Bolas
... I'm sorry. That didn't make sense. Could you please repeat it, using something more closely resembling actual English? I don't actually understand your point or even what your sentences are trying to say. As to the point on CSS, nobody wants to use a broken CSS renderer. They simply have