On 09/04/12 15:47, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Clay Leeds the.webmaes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 8, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
Yes, we'd lose the XML-based nature of the documentation. That's a fairly
large loss, but I don't know if that's a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
--- Comment #3 from az7...@googlemail.com 2012-04-12 10:03:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 28590
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28590
Short program to show that the glyph is not avaiable
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
--- Comment #4 from az7...@googlemail.com 2012-04-12 10:04:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 28591
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28591
Small example fo-file
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
--- Comment #5 from az7...@googlemail.com 2012-04-12 10:04:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 28592
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28592
Generated pdf-file from fopglyphs.fo
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
--- Comment #6 from az7...@googlemail.com 2012-04-12 10:05:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 28593
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28593
log-output during the generation
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
On 12/04/2012 10:09, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent,
My preference is to keep things as simple as possible. If keeping the
docs in xdoc format complicates the publishing process, then I’m not in
favour of it.
In particular, I’d like to remove the dependency on Forrest. Publishing
with
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
--- Comment #8 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-12 13:47:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
If that is true, then fop is misdesigned, and that IS a bug. There's no
reason
that you should need to access a physical head in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114
--- Comment #12 from Shawn shawn.pet...@cerner.com 2012-04-12 14:15:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 28595
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28595
Updated FO based based on recoomendations
My FO is using a fixed width
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114
--- Comment #13 from Shawn shawn.pet...@cerner.com 2012-04-12 14:15:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 28596
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28596
Output based on updated FO - Event worse
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49893
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114
--- Comment #14 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-12 16:27:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Created attachment 28596 [details]
Output based on updated FO - Event worse
(In reply to comment #11)
only fixed font usage is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114
--- Comment #15 from Shawn shawn.pet...@cerner.com 2012-04-12 17:31:56 UTC ---
That definitely seemed to work. Thanks!
I do need to know if this could potentially break existing text we might be
sending through this renderer that come out
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
--- Comment #10 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-12 18:04:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I agree that any dependencies on being attached to a head should be removed,
but the fact that fop works just fine with
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114
--- Comment #18 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-12 20:49:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Hey Glenn, it looks like you found a way to fix it? I don't suppose you could
provide any more details about what you think was
On Apr 12, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
Agreed that removing forrest dependency is desirable. However, presumably the
current xdocs would need to be converted to MD, in which case someone will
need to construct an XSLT to do so. That begs the question of whether it
18 matches
Mail list logo
