Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_URI_Unification

2012-07-05 Thread mehdi houshmand
Hi Chris/Glenn/Anyone else, You say command-line options should override the fop.xconf values, which makes sense. But should not-given command-line options override fop.xconf values too? Bare with me here, there is sense in the folly of that sentence. Ok, so let's take the example above, with

[Bug 51843] Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2012-07-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51843 --- Comment #33 from Shepard Lee shepardck...@gmail.com --- Hi All, I encountered the same issue on my applications using fop 1.0. Glad to see the issue is going to be fixed in the coming version. May I know if this bug will be fixed in

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_URI_Unification

2012-07-05 Thread Glenn Adams
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:41 AM, mehdi houshmand med1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Chris/Glenn/Anyone else, You say command-line options should override the fop.xconf values, which makes sense. But should not-given command-line options override fop.xconf values too? Bare with me here, there is

Re: [Bug 51843] Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2012-07-05 Thread Glenn Adams
No, this is NOT going to be fixed in the upcoming version. I have made NO statements about when this will be addressed in FOP. In particular, it will NOT be patched in 1.0 and will NOT be addressed in 1.1. This is a POSSIBLE 1.2 (or later) fix. On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:23 AM, bugzi...@apache.org

[Bug 51843] Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2012-07-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51843 --- Comment #34 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org --- (In reply to comment #33) Hi All, I encountered the same issue on my applications using fop 1.0. Glad to see the issue is going to be fixed in the coming version. May I know if

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_URI_Unification

2012-07-05 Thread Peter Hancock
Hi Vincent, FOP Dev, On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com wrote: snip/ And BTW, what is the recommended way to get a FopFactoryConfig? The javadoc of buildConfig doesn’t say. I think it should. The need to obtain an instance of a FopFactoryConfig

Re: git-svn doesn't update svn:mergeinfo

2012-07-05 Thread Vincent Hennebert
On 05/07/12 02:54, Glenn Adams wrote: On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Alexios Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.comwrote: Well actually git-svn has an option to update the svn:mergeinfo. It might be worth giving it a try. There are some restrictions and I suggest to test it first. The following is

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_URI_Unification

2012-07-05 Thread mehdi houshmand
Ok, so I've made the CLI options override when set, and not override when not set. I think that CommandLineOption class needs a little TLC, we can use Commons CLI or some such library ( http://java-source.net/open-source/command-line). No point reinventing the wheel. On 5 July 2012 08:27, Glenn

Comments on FopFactory.getRendererConfig (Temp_URI_Unification)

2012-07-05 Thread Alexios Giotis
Hi, I had a quick look on the work you are doing and I think that the newly introduced methods FopFactory.getRendererConfig(getRendererConfig(FOUserAgent userAgent, Configuration cfg, RendererConfigParser configCreator)) and the similar ones on FOUserAgent should all be replaced

Re: Comments on FopFactory.getRendererConfig (Temp_URI_Unification)

2012-07-05 Thread Peter Hancock
Hi Alexios, Thanks for taking a look at this. On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Alexios Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I had a quick look on the work you are doing and I think that the newly introduced methods FopFactory.getRendererConfig(getRendererConfig(FOUserAgent userAgent,