Peter B. West wrote:
But of course, I'm talking about Folio, which was built on a
pull-parsing model before I had ever heard of pull-parsing, because it
was the screamingly obvious thing to do. It gives me acute pleasure to
see my original design decisions vindicated by the the development of
This basically reverts a change I did in March. I don't know. Forrest is
sometimes a little mystery to me. Hopefully, I got it right this time.
Anyway, I think I can now successfully build the FOP site with
Forrestbot and try a test deployment under xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop.
On 22.08.2005 23:06:
Elliotte Harold wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
So I exaggerated. But how many better applications can you find me for
StAX than processing XSL-FO? If StAX has no application here, it has no
application. Is that what you're saying?
You're asking the question backwards. We should not be asking
On 22.08.2005 12:57:22 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > I've cleaned up JAXG and published it on my website:
> >
> > http://www.jeremias-maerki.ch/dev/jaxg/
> >
> > Comments are welcome.
>
> I thought the main problem with the current proposal was Sun's objection
> to the
Peter B. West wrote:
So I exaggerated. But how many better applications can you find me for
StAX than processing XSL-FO? If StAX has no application here, it has no
application. Is that what you're saying?
You're asking the question backwards. We should not be asking, "Is
XSL-FO the best po
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've cleaned up JAXG and published it on my website:
http://www.jeremias-maerki.ch/dev/jaxg/
Comments are welcome.
I thought the main problem with the current proposal was Sun's objection
to the name JAXG? Aren't you going to rename it before proceeding further?
Chr
I've cleaned up JAXG and published it on my website:
http://www.jeremias-maerki.ch/dev/jaxg/
Comments are welcome.
Jeremias Maerki
Elliotte Harold wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
Fopsters,
Some of you may be aware of the activity going on around StAX. Java
1.6 (Mustang) was to have included JAXP 1.4, but that looks to be on
hold until Dolphin. However, StAX will be part of it, and soon
enough, SAX will be a dim memory.
The Web Maestro wrote:
On Aug 21, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On the other side, maybe we should really take the time to write up a
short specification for the API and to have that voted on. After all,
this is the ma
