Re: [VOTE] Release FOP Trunk as FOP 0.90alpha1
+1 Congratulations! Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/15/2005 03:14:12 PM: This is it. Just to make it clear again: This is a a release vote and therefore a PMC vote, but every FOP committer is invited to place his vote or raise any objections. Noone gets ignored. Although fop-dev is in the CC, please place your votes on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Even though I haven't fully finished all of the documentation, yet, I'd like to start the vote. I'll have everthing finished by tomorrow evening (CET). I don't intend to do any more code changes, only the last documentation updates. http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ReleasePlanFirstPR shows the release plan and the status of the proceedings. I know of no legal problems needing attention. The external dependencies are well documented and every JAR in the lib directory is accompanied by its license. Hyphenation files have been removed. The unknown origin of some long-existing example FO files is not a problem IMO. 0.90alpha1 will carry a big warning sign in the README file that the software is a preview release and should not be used in production unless thoroughly tested for the target environment. It is intended to let everybody know that FOP is back in business and to produce feedback on our new piece of software from users that don't (or can't) download the code from SVN. I'd like to propose to release FOP SVN Trunk as version 0.90alpha1. +1 from me, obviously. Jeremias Maerki - Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37557] New: - missleading error msg from-table-column
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557 Summary: missleading error msg from-table-column Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P4 Component: page-master/layout AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i would suggest, that always the unimplemented error is thrown, because the the incorrect parameter ... error sounds like there is something wrong with the user fo-file whats a litte bit missleading. A clear error-message would prevent others from searching the error on their side and finding after all (after looking to the source) that it is an unimplementet feature. May be additionally a comment on the table-cell entry of the compliance-page would be helpfull. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37557] - missleading error msg from-table-column
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-18 15:55 --- Sorry your bug report isn't clear. What messages are you referring to? Please provide a sample FO file that demonstrates the problem (attach it to the bug report, don't Copy Paste it in) together with a more precise description of the error messages you are referring to. Thanks, Chris -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: Branch for 0.90 created
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:52 am, Christian Geisert wrote: Hi, I just created the Branch 'fop-0_90' for the release. So you can go on hacking on the trunk ... The commit for the README I just did should probably go into the branch - can you do that Christian? Manuel
Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
I compared a newly built fop-0.90alpha1-src.zip with my source directory from the repository. The following files are not in the distribution zip file, while I think they should: fop-0.90alpha1/KEYS fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.BCEL.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.NOTICE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.regexp.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.runtime.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/status.xml Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
Re: svn commit: r345474 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ test/fotree/ test/java/org/apache/fop/layoutengine/ test/layoutengine/
Manuel Mall wrote: Ooops, that wasn't very efficient as I did more or less the same thing. Oops, sorry. After several weeks of inactivity I thought I could polish up the old sketch and commit. There's still enough work to do though, see the separate post. J.Pietschmann
Re: svn commit: r345335 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/compliance.ihtml
A matter of definition, I guess. :-) Maybe we should really write [0.90alpha1] instead of [Latest] then. Care to do that? Or what do you prefer? On 18.11.2005 21:43:18 Simon Pepping wrote: Wouldn't latest point to the stable distribution, 0.20.5? Simon On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:45:59PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jeremias Date: Thu Nov 17 13:45:55 2005 New Revision: 345335 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345335view=rev Log: Changed Trunk to Latest Release/[Latest] Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/compliance.ihtml -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl Jeremias Maerki
Re: Issues with layout engine test framework
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:39:03PM +0100, J.Pietschmann wrote: Hi, a few thoughts about the layout engine test harness: - It won't run if CWD!=project.home, i.e. ant -find build.xml from a subdirectory fails the tests with a file not found exception. Neither the disabled testcase file nor any of the style sheets are found. This can be quite annoying with some IDEs. Indeed, it annoyed me yesterday evening. It would be good if we would reestablish independence of the current working directory by passing the base directory to the code. BTW. Ant 1.6.1 complains: build.xml:808: The fail type doesn't support the nested condition element. Do we really need a bleeding edge ant? (although the Ant people could be a bit less aggressive with adding features in minor releases too). The else attribute of the condition element (line 1046) requires Ant 1.6.3. Well, I upgraded. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
Re: Completeness of fop-0.90alpha1-src
Ok, fixed, along with a few other things. Interesting how many little things you can find that delay a release. :-) With the current build in the branch we are able to create the 3 distributions that I see are necessary: - Source distribution - Binary distribution for JDK 1.3 - Binary distribution for JDK 1.4 and later (containing support for ImageIO) To make a JDK 1.3 distribution build from scratch possible, add: javahome.jdk14 = your jdk 1.4 home path here to your build-local.properties. This enables build the docs while Ant runs under JDK 1.3 because Forrest needs JDK 1.4. On 18.11.2005 21:49:17 Jeremias Maerki wrote: Thanks, Simon. Good catch! I got that covered. Commit will follow shortly. On 18.11.2005 21:29:37 Simon Pepping wrote: I compared a newly built fop-0.90alpha1-src.zip with my source directory from the repository. The following files are not in the distribution zip file, while I think they should: fop-0.90alpha1/KEYS fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.BCEL.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.NOTICE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.regexp.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.runtime.LICENSE.txt fop-0.90alpha1/status.xml Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl Jeremias Maerki Jeremias Maerki
