DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RTF - list-item-label encoding (was: RTF and table/column widths (moved from fop-users))

2006-03-01 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Mar 1, 2006, at 08:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You changed the Writer.write to StringBuffer operations. I'd say that appending to a StringBuffer is much slower than writing directly to a BufferedOutputStream. There was a comparison between static concatenation, concatenation of Strings

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38821] New: - The manifest file no longer has a Class-Path entry

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: letter-spacing

2006-03-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 01.03.2006 16:44:39 Luca Furini wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > > The recommendation states that "The algorithm for resolving the adjusted > > > values between word spacing and letter spacing is User Agent dependent." > > > (7.17.2 in the candidate recommendation), so I think this is n

Re: letter-spacing

2006-03-01 Thread Luca Furini
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > The recommendation states that "The algorithm for resolving the adjusted > values between word spacing and letter spacing is User Agent dependent." > (7.17.2 in the candidate recommendation), so I think this is not a wrong > behaviour: it just assumes that word spaces

Re: letter-spacing

2006-03-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 01.03.2006 15:30:09 Luca Furini wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > Still trying to fix my problem with letter-spacing and fixed width > > spaces. Do I understand that correctly that XSL-FO's view of > > letter-spacing is different than, say, PDF's? PDF's character spacing > > (PDF 1.4, 5.2

Re: letter-spacing

2006-03-01 Thread Luca Furini
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Still trying to fix my problem with letter-spacing and fixed width spaces. Do I understand that correctly that XSL-FO's view of letter-spacing is different than, say, PDF's? PDF's character spacing (PDF 1.4, 5.2.1) is designed so it advances the cursor for each (!) chara

AW: RTF export enhancement

2006-03-01 Thread Peter Herweg
> Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Point 3: Yes, for tables, you will somehow need to keep track of the > various columns. I don't know the details of the current table support > in RTF in detail so I can't help off-hand. Maybe Peter Herweg can help > some more. Currently the class TableContext keeps track

letter-spacing

2006-03-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Still trying to fix my problem with letter-spacing and fixed width spaces. Do I understand that correctly that XSL-FO's view of letter-spacing is different than, say, PDF's? PDF's character spacing (PDF 1.4, 5.2.1) is designed so it advances the cursor for each (!) character by the Tc value. FO on