On Aug 23, 2006, at 21:59, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
The other consideration, but that would be for a more distant
future, is to be able to have three different threads:
- fo creation (a)
- base layoutengine initialization (b)
- actual breaking/layout (c)
A bit more elaboration:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40308.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40271.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Aug 24, 2006, at 15:08, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Hi Chris,
snip /
Well I'm not sure if its one of your recent changes thats to blame,
but I've just noticed that simple tables (test file attached)
appear to be issuing a SEVERE message to the log, i.e.
24-Aug-2006 14:04:41
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:59:14PM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Aug 23, 2006, at 21:16, Patrick Paul wrote:
Simon's correct. I'll clarify a bit more. From what I could tell,
Patrick's patch has added code at the right places, it only seems a
bit awkward to me to import stuff
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:40:25PM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Aug 23, 2006, at 21:59, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
The other consideration, but that would be for a more distant
future, is to be able to have three different threads:
- fo creation (a)
- base layoutengine
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40308.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40308.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40271.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Aug 24, 2006, at 19:45, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Aug 24, 2006, at 15:08, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Hi Chris,
snip /
Well I'm not sure if its one of your recent changes thats to
blame, but I've just noticed that simple tables (test file
attached) appear to be issuing a SEVERE message
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40308.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Aug 24, 2006, at 21:01, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:40:25PM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
This could actually be done in a single thread, chopping the process
up into discrete parts, and bouncing control from (a) to (b) to (c)
and back.
Implementing this with multiple
12 matches
Mail list logo
