Bug report for Fop [2006/09/10]
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) |
| | +-+
| | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement |
| | | +-+
| | | | Date Posted |
| | | | +--+
| | | | | Description |
| | | | | |
| 953|Opn|Nor|2001-03-12|Incorrect hyperlinks area rendering in justified t|
| 1063|New|Nor|2001-03-21|fop does not handle large fo files|
| 1180|New|Maj|2001-04-02|Problem with monospaced font |
| 1773|Opn|Blk|2001-05-16|A table that is bigger than the page produces an e|
| 1859|Opn|Min|2001-05-22|org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.reset() doesn't fully r|
| 1998|New|Nor|2001-06-05|linefeed-treatment not understood |
| 2150|Ass|Maj|2001-06-13|New page with a table-header but without any tabl|
| 2475|Ass|Nor|2001-07-06|Borders don't appear to work in fo:table-row|
| 2740|New|Maj|2001-07-23|multi-page tables sometimes render badly |
| 2909|New|Maj|2001-07-30|Gradient render error |
| 2964|Ass|Nor|2001-08-02|problems with height of cells in tables |
| 2988|New|Maj|2001-08-03|0.19: list-item-label does not stick to list-item-|
| 3044|Ass|Maj|2001-08-08|keep-together not functioning |
| 3280|New|Nor|2001-08-27|PCL Renderer doesn't work |
| 3305|Opn|Nor|2001-08-28|list-block overlapping footnote body |
| 3497|New|Cri|2001-09-07|id already exists error when using span=all attr|
| 3824|New|Blk|2001-09-25|MIF option with tables|
| 4030|New|Nor|2001-10-08|IOException creating Postscript with graphics on S|
| 4126|New|Nor|2001-10-12|FontState.width() returns pts instead of millipts |
| 4226|New|Nor|2001-10-17|The orphans property doesn't seem to work |
| 4388|New|Nor|2001-10-24|Nullpointer exception in the construction of new D|
| 4415|New|Nor|2001-10-25|scaling=uniform does not work on images... |
| 4510|New|Nor|2001-10-30|fo:inline common properties ignored? |
| 4535|New|Maj|2001-10-31|PCL renderer 1.13 not rendering SVG |
| 4767|New|Nor|2001-11-09|SVG text is distored in PDF output|
| 4814|Opn|Nor|2001-11-12|0.20.2RC infinitely loops if there are tables in f|
| 5001|New|Nor|2001-11-21|content-width and content-height ignored? |
| 5010|New|Enh|2001-11-21|Better error reporting needed |
| 5124|New|Maj|2001-11-27|fo:block-container is not rendered properly using |
| 5335|New|Min|2001-12-10|Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from |
| 5655|Ass|Nor|2002-01-02|text-decoration cannot take multiple values |
| 6094|Opn|Maj|2002-01-29|0.20.3rc hangs in endless loop|
| 6237|Opn|Nor|2002-02-05|#xFB01 (fi ligature) produces a sharp? |
| 6305|New|Nor|2002-02-07|Using fo:table-and-caption results in empty output|
| 6427|New|Enh|2002-02-13|Adding additional Type 1 fonts problem|
| 6437|New|Maj|2002-02-13|Tables without fo:table-column don't render |
| 6483|New|Nor|2002-02-15|Table, Loop, footer could not fit on page, moving|
| 6844|New|Nor|2002-03-04|No line breaks inserted in list-item-label|
| 6918|New|Enh|2002-03-06|reference-orientation has no effect |
| 6997|New|Nor|2002-03-09|[PATCH] Row-spanned row data breaks over a page wi|
| 7241|New|Nor|2002-03-19|keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on|
| 7283|New|Nor|2002-03-20|Table border misaligned when using margin-left in |
| 7337|New|Nor|2002-03-21|border around external image leaves empty space |
| 7487|New|Nor|2002-03-26|break-before=page for table inserts empty page |
| 7496|New|Nor|2002-03-26|The table header borders are not adjusted to the b|
| 7525|New|Cri|2002-03-27|table with spans inside a list-block |
| 7919|New|Cri|2002-04-10|problem to use attribute linefeed-treatment and li|
| 8003|Ass|Maj|2002-04-12|FopImageFactory never releases cached images |
| 8050|New|Nor|2002-04-13|Soft hyphen (shy;) is not handled properly |
| 8321|New|Nor|2002-04-19|from-parent('width') returns 0 for nested tables |
| 8463|New|Nor|2002-04-24|SVG clipping in external.fo example doc when rende|
|
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40458] New: - difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458 Summary: difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta) Product: Fop Version: 0.92 Platform: Sun OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdf AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can anyone Give me the difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta). Because when I have shifted the vesion 0.20.5 to 0.92(beta) but have not changed xsl file which I was previously using. so, it is not giving me data in 0.92(beta) vesion but in 0.20.5 it is showing that data. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40387] - PFMFile.load() crashes if a font has a name longer than 16 characters and also if parsing pfm files larger than 2048 bytes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40387. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40387 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 06:40 --- I've taken a look at your patch and the fix for the font name is clear enough. However, the buffer parameter for the BufferedInputStream puzzles me. You add a new method signature with a buffer parameter but you didn't also make a change in PFMReader so that the official command-line tool profits from the change. It looks more like you added this so you can work around the problem in your environment. I'd prefer a more general fix if possible. So, should we simply hard-code the buffer size to 16KB or something like that to avoid the seemingly rare problem you're experiencing? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40442] - [PATCH] percent length not working in font-size for rtf output
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40442. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40442 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 06:48 --- Creating LayoutManagers in RTF output is not really the right idea. LayoutManagers are to be used only inside the layout engine which for RTF isn't used. I realize it's a tempting move but from a design perspective, it is wrong. A different solution has to be found. IMO, we have to have special implementations for PercentBaseContext for output formats which don't use the layout engine. These implementations could even be used by the layout managers, thus removing the need to implement PercentBaseContext there. If another committer disagrees with my statement, please reopen the issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40458] - difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 06:53 --- If you have a question on Apache FOP please post that on the fop-users mailing list [1]. Bugzilla is for bugs and keeping track of work items. [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/maillist.html#fop-user FOP 0.20.5 did many things wrong which FOP 0.92beta does much better. So if the XSL-FO you generated for 0.20.5 doesn't work in 0.92beta it means your FO was wrong and has to be improved. Details what needs to be changed can be found under: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.92/upgrading.html If this information doesn't help, please post log output and possibly an FO file (not XSLT!) to the fop-users mailing list so people can give you some hints. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40458] - difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 08:19 --- (In reply to comment #0) Can anyone Give me the difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta). Because when I have shifted the vesion 0.20.5 to 0.92(beta) but have not changed xsl file which I was previously using. so, it is not giving me data in 0.92(beta) vesion but in 0.20.5 it is showing that data. == We are fop for xml-pdf conversion. when i am running my xsl file 0.92(beta) version then it is not going to show data in below tag. If i am using 0.20.5 version then it is showing data. so, is there any changes on below tag? xsl:for-each select=/test/test1 fo:table-row border-width=0.5pt fo:table-cell fo:blockhi 1/fo:block fo:block text-align=left FROM DATE: xsl:value-of select=translate (fromDate,$smallLetters,$capitalLetters)/ /fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40458] - difference between xsl used for FOP Verison 0.20.5 and 0.92(beta)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 13:25 --- Can you give the full call to fop (The full command line if called from a shell). I guess you use the -xml xxx -xls options so you never see the real fo-inputfile. My experience is that the build in (or should i say internaly called) xsl processer is sometimes funny. I can only suggest to use an external xls processor like xsltproc or xalan. After having problems with the build in xls processor I switched to xsltproc which worked fine for me. I dont know if there is a possibility to see/store the internaly generated fo-file which would be needed for following your problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40464] New: - Improve handling of OpenType fonts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40464 Summary: Improve handling of OpenType fonts Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fonts AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As discussed in http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11545300391r=1w=2 This is an umbrella, see the ones listed in blocked by for details -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: Re: Re: Implementing OpenType font support, how hard?
On 8/4/06, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...I'll discuss the plan with my project's stakeholders and hopefully get the green light to invest time in this... Good news, I got the green light and will be working on these OpenType improvements in the next few weeks. I'll use the dependencies of issue 40464 [1] to document my progress, and of course discuss the details here. -Bertrand [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=40464
Bugzilla component added: fonts
I have added a new fonts component in the list of components for FOP, in bugzilla. Hope it's ok - If not, just yell ;-) -Bertrand
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40465] New: - Obtain some OpenType fonts for testing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465 Summary: Obtain some OpenType fonts for testing Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fonts AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try to get a few OpenType reference fonts that can be distributed with FOP for testing and demonstration. Ask some font editors. The fonts could be crippled if they want, for example by removing portions of the glyph sets. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40466] New: - Improve support for custom OpenType fonts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40466. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40466 Summary: Improve support for custom OpenType fonts Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fonts AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check that OpenType fonts with TrueType outlines are usable as custom fonts, including kerning. Fix things as needed, and have a look at what's needed to support Type 1/CFF outlines. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40467] New: - Fix encoding in the PDF output when using custom fonts (ToUnicode table)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40467. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40467 Summary: Fix encoding in the PDF output when using custom fonts (ToUnicode table) Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdf AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FOP does not currently generate a ToUnicode table in the output PDF, this must be corrected to have correct encodings in PDF. Without this, cut and paste from PDF is not correct, and search fails with non-ASCII characters. The current situation is correctly documented at http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/fonts.html, under TrueType font metrics. A patch has been provided (bug #5335, comment #9) but apparently the code comes from the FOray project, see if they agree to donate this code. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40464] - Improve handling of OpenType fonts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40464 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||40465, 40466, 40467 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40465] - Obtain some OpenType fonts for testing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||40464 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40467] - Fix encoding in the PDF output when using custom fonts (ToUnicode table)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40467. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40467 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||40464 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40466] - Improve support for custom OpenType fonts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40466. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40466 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||40464 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Looking for OpenType fonts to distribute with FOP, for testing
Hi FOP community, I'm working on OpenType font support improvements [1], and I'm trying to get permission to distribute some OpenType fonts with FOP to test and demonstrate this. If anyone has good fonts that they could donate, or contacts to help make this happen, please let me know! -Bertrand [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=40464
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40468] - Use OpenType fonts from the STIX fonts project?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40468. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40468 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||40465 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40465] - Obtain some OpenType fonts for testing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||40468 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40468] - Use OpenType fonts from the STIX fonts project?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40468. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40468 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 14:32 --- Here is the user license for the STIX fonts: http://www.stixfonts.org/user_license.html -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5335] - Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from pdf
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5335 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 15:32 --- The attachment of comment #10 apparently contains code coming from FOray, see bug #40467 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40465] - Obtain some OpenType fonts for testing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 15:39 --- Free fonts can be found at: http://www.nongnu.org/freefont/ Unfortunately they are not for immediate download in otf format, but can be converted using: http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/ hth Max -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40465] - Obtain some OpenType fonts for testing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40465 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 15:42 --- Unfortunetely the fonts I've just mentioned are GPL, but maybe we can ask the freefont people to provide downloadable OTF versions? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5335] - Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from pdf
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5335 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 16:17 --- (In reply to comment #12) The attachment of comment #10 apparently contains code coming from FOray, see bug #40467 Recent updates to this thread were brought to my attention for the purpose of obtaining permission for FOP to use the mentioned FOray code. FOP may freely use the code mentioned or any other FOray code as it wishes, and FOP may consider it contributed by FOray. It pains me a bit that we are doing the cut-and-paste thing, but this is perhaps my fault for being so slow to release FOray 0.2. I did an aXSL release last week and hope to do a FOray release within the next two weeks, not because FOray as a whole is ready to release, but I think the font code is. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: svn commit: r442282 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/extensions/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/extensions/
As mentioned last month, I just changed the property names a little bit. If anyone finds these inappropriate, please yell. You might need to do a full rebuild after updating. I had to, but I'm not quite sure why. On 11.09.2006 20:24:37 jeremias wrote: Author: jeremias Date: Mon Sep 11 11:24:35 2006 New Revision: 442282 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442282 Log: Implemented limited support for extension properties through new methods on ElementMapping (backwards-compatible). Moved block-progression-unit into the fox: namespace. Implemented new extension properties: fox:orphan-content-limit and fox:widow-content-limit for fo:table and fo:list-block. See documentation for details. Bugfix in ElementListUtils.removeLegalBreaks (concerning box/glue combinations). Added a unit test to cover the problem. Added: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/java/org/apache/fop/util/ElementListUtilsTestCase.java (with props) xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/list-block_fox_orphan-content-limit_1.xml (with props) xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/list-block_fox_widow-content-limit_1.xml (with props) xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/table_fox_orphan-content-limit_1.xml (with props) xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/table_fox_widow-content-limit_1.xml (with props) xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/table_fox_widow-content-limit_2.xml (with props) Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/extensions.xml xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/Constants.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ElementMapping.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ElementMappingRegistry.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/FOElementMapping.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/FOPropertyMapping.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/FObj.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/PropertyList.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/extensions/ExtensionElementMapping.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/extensions/svg/SVGElementMapping.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ListBlock.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Table.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/ElementListUtils.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/list/ListBlockLayoutManager.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table/TableContentLayoutManager.java xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/status.xml Jeremias Maerki
