Hi Jeremias,
As far as I understand the event-model.xml and test-event-model.xml
files are automatically generated at build time. Is there any reason to
put them under version control then?
And this one is more to myself, to be sure I understand how things are
working. At several places you
Hi Vincent
On 30.01.2008 12:10:58 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
As far as I understand the event-model.xml and test-event-model.xml
files are automatically generated at build time. Is there any reason to
put them under version control then?
Good catch. I guess I was confused by
Vincent's feedback reminded me about something else we probably should
look at. Vincent proposed to add a dependency on the Xerces/Xalan XML
serializer. As noted, I'd prefer to stick to plain JAXP. But yes, with
Java 1.4 JAXP is built in so the 4 XML JARs are actually not necessary
anymore (would
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44328.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Jan 30, 2008, at 14:46, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Vincent's feedback reminded me about something else we probably should
look at. Vincent proposed to add a dependency on the Xerces/Xalan XML
serializer. As noted, I'd prefer to stick to plain JAXP. But yes, with
Java 1.4 JAXP is built in so the
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
- Our test code has a (useful) dependency on Xalan's XPath API. Java 1.4
provides an old JAXP version without XPath support (javax.xml.xpath,
available with Java 1.5). So we've got a problem here for the time being.
Although it is valuable that users can run the test
On Jan 30, 2008, at 13:01, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Jeremias, Vincent,
snip /
However, there's one thing in this context that is still on my list
and
that I want to change eventually: We have multiple places where we
create a new TransformerFactory. It's always the platform default that
is
Interesting. Both Jörg and you prefer solution 1. That's perfectly fine
with me. So if there are no other voices in the next couple of days I
shall do the necessary changes next week. It's probably best to dedicate
a separate page on the release docs to the topic so it's visible enough.
Thanks
I'm not sure, yet, if it's so easily possible to get the
TransformerFactory from the FopFactory as it's not available everywhere.
This could take some additional wiring. At first I was simply thinking
about a classloader-wide setting (i.e. static variable) plus a system
property. After all, it's
