Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:57, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.07.2008 14:49:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
Going through the occurrences, I'm getting the impression that in
some cases, we don't even really need the URL. The URI would do just
fine if we don't need the functionalit
On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:57, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.07.2008 14:49:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
Going through the occurrences, I'm getting the impression that in
some cases, we don't even really need the URL. The URI would do just
fine if we don't need the functionality for opening a stream...
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.07.2008 14:49:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jeremias
Date: Sat Jul 12 05:19:40 2008
New Revision: 676161
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676161&view=rev
Log:
Attempt to fix a potential build problem.
F
On 12.07.2008 14:49:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Author: jeremias
> > Date: Sat Jul 12 05:19:40 2008
> > New Revision: 676161
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676161&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Attempt to fix a potential build proble
On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jeremias
Date: Sat Jul 12 05:19:40 2008
New Revision: 676161
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676161&view=rev
Log:
Attempt to fix a potential build problem.
FWIW, I've locally replaced all occurrences of File.toURL() in the
co
On 12.07.2008 11:56:23 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 13:22, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > Bonekrusher and I had an exchange off-list. He did a few tests for me
> > and my recent change didn't help either.
> >
> > Basically, we established the following:
> > - He's also running WinXP
On Jul 11, 2008, at 13:22, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Bonekrusher and I had an exchange off-list. He did a few tests for me
and my recent change didn't help either.
Basically, we established the following:
- He's also running WinXP
- He's running the same JDK as I do.
The /exact/ same one (identi
On 11.07.2008 22:31:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:55, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > ... So the IFRenderer actually doesn't generate any XML itself.
> > That will be the job of the
> > IFSerializer. So IFRenderer will not subclass AbstractXMLRenderer.
>
> Apart from that, I
