[GUMP@vmgump]: Project xml-fop-test (in module xml-fop) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project xml-fop-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52206] [PATCH] Small performance improvements by adding static declarations

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206 --- Comment #2 from Alexis Giotis 2011-11-21 21:14:00 UTC --- Hi Vincent, I guess you are referring to the removed lines in PropertyMaker.java. During the tests, I had disabled most of the logging by setting the log4j priority to WARN fo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52206] [PATCH] Small performance improvements by adding static declarations

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52206 --- Comment #1 from Vincent Hennebert 2011-11-21 15:51:44 UTC --- Hi Alexis, Thanks for your patch. Just a question about the removal of traces: surely if you disable trace logging there shouldn't be any impact on performance? And if you

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project xml-fop-test (in module xml-fop) failed

This is because fop-hyph.jar is not in the classpath in Gump. I logged an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-166 If for licensing reasons we cannot add it to the Gump classpath, then we will have to exclude the HyphenationLayoutTestCase from the regex in the junit-all target. Vince

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52197] [PATCH] AFM encoding

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52197 Mehdi Houshmand changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Memory leak bugs

Hi, Could someone of developers review bug 43940 [1], and possibly apply patches 1 and 2 to the trunk? Those paches will bring faster decimal formatter, which is heavily used within FOP. I also think that patches 3 and 4 should be transfered to bug 51150 [2], and bug 43940 marked as resolved

Re: Documentation of new testing tools

Hi, I've hopefully provided enough information at the link below, if I've missed anything, I'd be happy to amend the wiki page. http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/CreateUnitTests Mehdi On 21 November 2011 09:09, Chris Bowditch wrote: > On 19/11/2011 11:04, mehdi houshmand wrote: >> >>

Re: Documentation of new testing tools

On 19/11/2011 11:04, mehdi houshmand wrote: Hi Simon, Hi Mehdi, My apologies, I did float the idea about the layout engine tests and kept to the suggestions that were given me. As such, creating tests is exactly the same and the subset of tests run are still configurable via System properties

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project xml-fop-test (in module xml-fop) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project xml-fop-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue