https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773
--- Comment #4 from Antti Karanta antti.kara...@napa.fi 2012-04-24 06:39:27
UTC ---
I tried reproducing the problem but fop-1.0 seems to raise an exception:
org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: Requested page number is out of range: 0;
only
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
--- Comment #11 from Luis Bernardo lmpmberna...@gmail.com 2012-04-24 08:40:44
UTC ---
this is an outofmemory issue so what does not work in one machine may work in
some other. you only see the issue if your machine runs out of memory in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
--- Comment #12 from Luis Bernardo lmpmberna...@gmail.com 2012-04-24 08:45:26
UTC ---
Created attachment 28665
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28665
example
repeat the content inside the block (it is long enough
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
I find that Bugzilla Just Works and is easy to use. I don’t really see
the need to change as long as it’s available. What support do we need
from infra anyway? But as long as I don’t have anything to do...
+0
Vincent
On 17/04/12 09:15, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Hi All,
We need to have a formal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52977
Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52977
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51101
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2012-04-24
14:58:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 28668
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28668
Resulting PDF output
--
Configure bugmail:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22/04/12 21:09, gad...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gadams
Date: Sun Apr 22 20:09:42 2012
New Revision: 1328963
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328963view=rev
Log:
Snapshot commit - does not build!
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50196
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
ok, on digging into this further i have found:
(1) luis is correct that embedding is performed by default without the
referenced-fonts element;
(2) in particular, when i add referenced-fontsmatch
font-family=SimSun//referenced-fonts i see the same behavior: glyphs
not found; when i remove, it
btw, this code has been present since 2008-05-08 [1]
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=654461
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
ok, on digging into this further i have found:
(1) luis is correct that embedding is performed by default
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
Bug #: 53142
Summary: non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be
single byte, even when they are multi byte
Product: Fop
Version: 1.1dev
Platform: All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
--- Comment #1 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-24 19:49:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 28670
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28670
FOP configuration file
simsun.ttf should be downloaded and placed into a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
--- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-24 19:49:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 28671
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28671
console log
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
--- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-24 19:50:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 28672
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28672
output PDF file
output when configured for referencing (non-embedding)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
--
Configure
bug filed at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
jean-philippe, you may want to create a bugzilla account and add yourself
to the CC list for this bug
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
ok, on digging into this further i have found:
(1)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
ju...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ju...@apache.org
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143
Bug #: 53143
Summary: fonts loaded twice (redundantly)
Product: Fop
Version: 1.1dev
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
23 matches
Mail list logo
