Release (was Vacation)
On 05/09/2012 13:55, mehdi houshmand wrote:
Hi All,
Apart from my initial e-mail there's nothing private in this e-mail
thread, so
moving the discussion to fop-dev.
Bugzilla#53790 applies to FOP1.1. It's a blocking point if you're
working with TIFF, do you
Hi,
Just double check your XGC JAR is the same as the version in trunk, a
commit to the TIFF image system was committed and had a new XGC committed
too, trunk on my computer compiles without issues.
Thanks
Mehdi
On 18 September 2012 00:04, Bonekrusher djs...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi, I updated to
Hi All,
I believe I've completed the work on XGC to allow restrictions to the I/O
capabilities, by default, obviously, the mechanisms haven't changed. I've
tried to address some of the suggestions made by the community, Jeremias'
in particular, about the ramifications of changing the APIs and as
Hi,
Sorry for the slow response. What I meant was that you should double check
that your XMLGraphics JAR (lib/xmlgraphics-commons-1.5svn.jar) is inline
with the FOP-trunk version. FOP builds on my machine and GUMP (the
automagical build runner) hasn't thrown any exceptions of late, so it's
most
On 24.09.2012 06:14, mehdi houshmand wrote:
Ok... This one's a tricksy little badger. Basically, because you're
using a font-size that's so large (especially when you convert pts -
mpts as FOP works in) we're basically seeing an integer-overflow issue:
2579 pts = 2579000 mpts
833mpts
a tolerance for equals()
- cast to integer for renderer
WDYT?
2012/9/25 mehdi houshmand med1...@gmail.com:
While you may be right Pascal, I'm sure this isn't a good example of a
legitimate use-case. But then what do we use? A long? Then what have we
really done? Realistically we're just moving
Ok Matthias, I'll try and take a look at it and compare it to some of the
test cases we have.
On 26 September 2012 20:14, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53724
Matthias Reischenbacher matthias8...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed
+1
On 12 October 2012 10:40, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch
Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox'
extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners.
Please refer to
+1 from me
On 23 October 2012 13:25, Clay Leeds the.webmaes...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me...
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet
On Oct 22, 2012, at 8:04 AM, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Glenn,
I have just committed to
+1 for it being an optional dependency.
On Jan 10, 2013 2:45 PM, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 if usage is restricted to OTF CFF fonts at first.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Hennebert
vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
Vincent
On 10/01/13 13:07, Robert Meyer
From my limited experience posting to PDFBox, they process patches pretty
quickly and post feedback where appropriate promptly too. Dunno if that
eases your concerns Pascal, but that's my 2 cents worth
On Jan 10, 2013 11:02 AM, Robert Meyer rme...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Ignore my last message.
+1 from me
On 22 April 2014 19:59, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
In that case, I will add my +1.
Thanks for the good work Seifeddine and Vincent!
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Vincent Hennebert
vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22/04/14 18:25, Glenn Adams wrote:
Are you
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
