>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 08:40 PM
>
>You’re both right of course. I didn’t have that possibility in mind when
>writing my post to fop-dev. No warning needed indeed :-)
[Me: ]
>>> * if it is not a
Chris, Andreas,
You’re both right of course. I didn’t have that possibility in mind when
writing my post to fop-dev. No warning needed indeed :-)
> Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>> The only modification would be:
>> * surrounding the method body of
>> ColumnNumberPropertyMaker.make(PropertyList, Stri
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
In the meantime, I made this change locally, but stumbled on the fact that we
do not have an event defined for non-applicable properties.
Now I'm wondering whether we should warn about those at all. According to the
XSL-FO Recommendation, any property may be specifie
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 03:56 PM
> In this case, all it takes is one look at the property definition (*) to find
> out
> that the behavior is only defined for fo:table-cell and fo:table-column.
forg
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 01:18 PM
>
>>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>>Van: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 12:17 PM
>>
>
>>
>>FOP lacks of robustness h