Re: svn commit: r332007 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo

2005-11-09 Thread Simon Pepping 
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Author: jeremias
 Date: Wed Nov  9 00:58:20 2005
 New Revision: 332007
 
 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007view=rev
 Log:
 Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.

Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then
hide it from FOP?

Simon 

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl

Re: svn commit: r332007 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo

2005-11-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki 
I know it's not strictly necessary. It's just there for regression
testing purposes and as a demonstration that you don't have to use the
fo: prefix. It doesn't hurt, does it?

On 09.11.2005 21:38:32 Simon Pepping wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Author: jeremias
  Date: Wed Nov  9 00:58:20 2005
  New Revision: 332007
  
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007view=rev
  Log:
  Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.
 
 Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then
 hide it from FOP?



Jeremias Maerki