Simon Pepping schrieb:
I had a look at some other Apache projects:
cocoon: latest
excalibur: current
jakarta-struts: current
lucene: current
jakarta-regexp: current
james: current
logging/log4j: latest=1.2.12, unstable=1.3alpha7
rive
I had a look at some other Apache projects:
cocoon: latest
excalibur: current
jakarta-struts: current
lucene: current
jakarta-regexp: current
james: current
logging/log4j: latest=1.2.12, unstable=1.3alpha7
rivet: curre
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> A matter of definition, I guess. :-) Maybe we should really write
> [0.90alpha1] instead of [Latest] then. Care to do that? Or what do you
> prefer?
When I visit a site with software, I expect the name latest to point
to the latest
A matter of definition, I guess. :-) Maybe we should really write
[0.90alpha1] instead of [Latest] then. Care to do that? Or what do you
prefer?
On 18.11.2005 21:43:18 Simon Pepping wrote:
> Wouldn't latest point to the stable distribution, 0.20.5?
>
> Simon
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:45:59P
Wouldn't latest point to the stable distribution, 0.20.5?
Simon
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:45:59PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Thu Nov 17 13:45:55 2005
> New Revision: 345335
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345335&view=rev
> Log:
> Changed "Trunk" to "La
