(ccing fop-dev and XML PMC)
Last year I've invested hours after hours doing a license audit on the
XML FOP project mainly because of problems with the hyphenation pattern
files. These files have been converted to XML by FOP contributors but
almost all files are coming from TeX software repositorie
jeremias2004/03/05 05:33:01
Added: src/hyph da.xml
Log:
Re-adding danish hyphenation patterns (grant from Frank Jensen on file)
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +145 -129 xml-fop/src/hyph/da.xml
---
At 9:07 PM -0800 3/4/04, Clay Leeds wrote:
On Mar 4, 2004, at 6:53 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
At 10:43 AM +1000 3/5/04, Peter B. West wrote:
I think this might be because the HEAD developers were moving to
a JAXP implementation, and SAXParserFactory is still in the 1.4
javax.xml.parsers
Jeremias wrote:
> On 28.02.2004 20:16:56 Clay Leeds wrote:
> > It would also be nice, if there were some sort of "repository" or links
> > page on the FOP site where people can go to get hyphenation files that
> > cannot be included in FOP because they do not meet the needs of the
> > ALv2 (assu
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> At 9:07 PM -0800 3/4/04, Clay Leeds wrote:
> >- if XMLReaderFactory works under JDK 1.3 and/or 1.2, what kinds of
> >benefits might fop-0.20.5 see from a switch to XMLReaderFactory?
>
> Cleaner simpler code that's less likely to get hosed by different
> implementat
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
But that's not the reason I write this. I've done the relicensing on the
XML FOP project and was again confronted with our hyphenation files. Two
of them now have the ALv2 header because for these two files all legal
problems have been dealt with
I don't think it is necessary
I agree. But if we don't put them under the ALv2 we need to clearly mark
the files as such. Like we do for the JARs in the lib directory.
But before we do anything I'd like to see if there's any answer to my
questions.
On 05.03.2004 21:29:39 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > But t
At 8:53 PM +0100 3/5/04, Simon Pepping wrote:
It took me a little while, but I now remember again why I did not want
to use the XMLReaderFactory. I do not understand how I can guarantee
that I get an XMLReader that is capable of validation. In
SAXParserFactory I can configure the factory to look fo
By the way, if you're curious you can look at the code for
SAXParserFactory (and its default concrete subclass in Java 1.4) in
the Apache Crimson CVS (which is ungodly slow today, not sure why).
It's easy to see that it never returns any parser other than Crimson,
regardless of what features yo
pbwest 2004/03/05 21:53:16
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/apps Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
Driver.java InputHandler.java Fop.java
Added: src/java/org/apache/fop/apps Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FOPOptions.java FOFileHandler.java
pbwest 2004/03/05 21:55:13
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FOTree.java
Log:
Adjusted for Configuration instance, and use of java.util.logging
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
pbwest 2004/03/05 21:56:58
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/xml Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FoXmlSerialHandler.java
Log:
Adjusted for Configuration instance, and use of java.util.logging
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
pbwest 2004/03/05 21:59:10
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/configuration Tag:
FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design Configuration.java
ConfigurationReader.java ConfigurationParser.java
Log:
Made Configuration instance.
Revision ChangesPath
pbwest 2004/03/05 22:00:19
Added: lib Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design commons-cli-1.0.jar
Log:
Used for CLI option sprocessing in FOPOptions
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.1 +127 -0xml-fop/lib/Attic/comm
pbwest 2004/03/05 22:02:50
Added: lib Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design xml-commons.LICENSE.txt
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.1 +60 -0 xml-fop/lib/Attic/xml-commons.LICENSE.txt
pbwest 2004/03/05 22:03:44
Added: conf Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design fop.xconf
Log:
For later use in integrating alt-design with HEAD
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.3.2.1 +0 -0 xml-fop/conf/fop.xconf
pbwest 2004/03/05 22:06:03
Modified:.Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design .classpath .project
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.7 +2 -1 xml-fop/Attic/.classpath
Index: .classpath
=
pbwest 2004/03/05 22:06:33
Added: .externalToolBuilders Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design Alt-design
clean.launch Alt-Design build.launch Alt-design
clean build.launch
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
N
pbwest 2004/03/05 22:08:39
Modified:build/classes/conf Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design .cvsignore
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.2 +3 -1 xml-fop/build/classes/conf/Attic/.cvsignore
Index: .cvsignore
pbwest 2004/03/05 22:16:56
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/apps Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FOPOptions.java
Log:
Used OptionBuilder for all args
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.2 +7 -3
Forgot to CC. Please follow up on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forwarded by Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Original Message ---
From:Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:45:45 +0100
Subject: Re: Fe
21 matches
Mail list logo
