Thanks to Victor and Andreas for helping me here, although I'm still
confused.
On 27.01.2005 00:25:27 Victor Mote wrote:
> Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
>
> > Do you feel the contents of the block-container should not be
> > broken up at all? (Hence the analogy to a fo:external-graphic?)
>
> No, s
Dear FOP Developers,
I'm re-posting this mail from the user list, because there was no clear
answer there.
The main questions are:
- what are the plans concerning the future FOP releases? Is there a defined
timeline?
- what are the plans concerning the spec conformance?
Your answers are greatel
Ilya,
NOTE: This message does not reflect a decision of the FOP Development
Team. Rather it is my own thoughts on the subject. If there are any
mistakes or inaccuracies in my thinking or reasoning, I hope the FOP
Team will let us know. My goal is to give Ilya and other an answer on
this importa
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Thanks to Victor and Andreas for helping me here, although
> I'm still confused.
>
> On 27.01.2005 00:25:27 Victor Mote wrote:
> > Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
> >
> > > Do you feel the contents of the block-container should
> not be broken
> > > up at all? (Hence the a
Thank you, Victor, now I think I finally understand what you mean.
However, I see is that this could lead to very funny results. Imagine a
BC with BPD set, overflow=repeat and reference-orientation=180. When the
contents overflow the first VPA, a new one is created under the first
(in BC parent's B
