Re: (Jeremias, Keiron) Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes
Sorry for not being clear. I also meant the layoutmanager package. On 26.06.2003 00:37:25 Glen Mazza wrote: Should LayoutHandler go into the Layout (Jeremias) package or LayoutManager package (Keiron)? (Personally, I don't care--99% for me is getting them out of apps.) Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (Jeremias, Keiron) Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes
Good--that's where it will go then (barring an onslaught of -1's between now and this weekend) BTW, I believe my original rationale for placing in the Area package was by looking at the imports in LayoutHandler--it seemed to be very heavily dependent on the particular implementation of the Area Tree being used. I wasn't focusing on its function/purpose. Glen --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for not being clear. I also meant the layoutmanager package. On 26.06.2003 00:37:25 Glen Mazza wrote: Should LayoutHandler go into the Layout (Jeremias) package or LayoutManager package (Keiron)? (Personally, I don't care--99% for me is getting them out of apps.) Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes
+1 for moving them out, but as Keiron suggested I'd also prefer LayoutHandler in the layout package. On 25.06.2003 00:55:57 Glen Mazza wrote: While Victor and Jeremias are discussing an input API--I'd like to take advantage now of the relative freeze in the codebase to move the StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes from the apps package to the fo and area packages respectively (similar to what we're doing with MIF/RTFHandler). Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Jeremias, Keiron) Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes
Should LayoutHandler go into the Layout (Jeremias) package or LayoutManager package (Keiron)? (Personally, I don't care--99% for me is getting them out of apps.) Glen --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for moving them out, but as Keiron suggested I'd also prefer LayoutHandler in the layout package. On 25.06.2003 00:55:57 Glen Mazza wrote: While Victor and Jeremias are discussing an input API--I'd like to take advantage now of the relative freeze in the codebase to move the StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes from the apps package to the fo and area packages respectively (similar to what we're doing with MIF/RTFHandler). Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes
Team, While Victor and Jeremias are discussing an input API--I'd like to take advantage now of the relative freeze in the codebase to move the StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes from the apps package to the fo and area packages respectively (similar to what we're doing with MIF/RTFHandler). It primarily involves moving two files and updating the headers of several others. I've already submitted a patch for this (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20397) but it has fallen out of date; this time I will make the change again and commit it to CVS. I should be able to get it done this weekend (sorry I can't do it earlier.) Here's my +1 on this. Thanks, Glen __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes
Team, While Victor and Jeremias are discussing an input API--I'd like to take advantage now of the relative freeze in the codebase to move the StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes from the apps package to the fo and area packages respectively (similar to what we're doing with MIF/RTFHandler). Shouldn't the LayoutHandler go with the layout manager package. The area package is really only for the area tree. It primarily involves moving two files and updating the headers of several others. I've already submitted a patch for this (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20397) but it has fallen out of date; this time I will make the change again and commit it to CVS. I should be able to get it done this weekend (sorry I can't do it earlier.) Here's my +1 on this. +1 for moving them out of apps. Thanks, Glen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
