gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5431
space attributes don't work in FOP 0.20.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
> With SuSe Linux V7.1, FOP 0.20.2 and Java2 SDK, V1.3.1 the system answers
my
> request:
...
solved in the meantime: with glibc 2.2.4 instead of 2.2 in works expectedly.
Keith
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
more detailed (java -verbose):
[DEBUG]: output file: temp/test.pdf
[DEBUG]: OPTIONS
[DEBUG]: no user configuration file is used [default]
[DEBUG]: debug mode on
[DEBUG]: dump configuration
[DEBUG]: quiet mode on
[Loaded org.xml.sax.SAXException]
[Loaded org.apache.fop.apps.Options]
[Loaded sun.mi
Hi FOP Users!
With SuSe Linux V7.1, FOP 0.20.2 and Java2 SDK, V1.3.1 the system answers my
request:
/usr/lib/java/bin/java -classpath
/usr/lib/java/lib/classes.zip:/usr/local/fop/fop.jar:/usr/local/fop/lib/xerc
es.jar:/usr/local/fop/lib/xalan.jar:/usr/local/fop/lib/batik.jar:/usr/local/
fop/lib
I have a question regarding fo:marker.
if a fo:retrieve-marker cant retrieve any marker it has not to return any
area. So I mean.
But I get allways the Error:
[WARN]: Some static content could not fit in the area.
and the document looks not well.
If You delete the marker in the glossary.xsl examp
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5431
space attributes don't work in FOP 0.20.2
Summary: space attributes don't work in FOP 0.20.2
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
Severity: Major
They are generated in the ant build script. Try using the build/src
directory instead of src.
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:46:24 +0100 jean-guillaume.battaglia wrote:
> Hi people.
>
>
> I am trying to run FOP with Visual Age.
> To see how FOP works, i have chosen to use the .java files present in the
Hi people. I am trying to run FOP with Visual Age.To see how FOP works, i have chosen to use the .java files present in the "src" directory.But some classes are missing : all the classes from the package "org.apache.fop.fo.properties". I've found these classes in the file fop.jar.So I don't really
ted?
Regards,
Karen
Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> I built and uploaded the tarballs for the binary and source distributions,
> for FOP-0.20.2. They are labelled as release candidates. Please test and let
> me know what needs to be fixed. Thanks.
>
> I am shooting
I want the fo:inline-container element will be implement!
thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, all
I built and uploaded the tarballs for the binary and source distributions,
for FOP-0.20.2. They are labelled as release candidates. Please test and let
me know what needs to be fixed. Thanks.
I am shooting for a final build on Tuesday.
The CHANGES file is not yet updated - I will be
>From reading the 0.20.1 sources it appears that the StreamHandler (or
whatever, I must confess I forgot the exact name) in the Driver's
FOPTreeBuilder will not be initialized if one uses the results of
getContentHandler() to drive the Driver with SAX messages.
I note in the latest sources this h
12 matches
Mail list logo